Webinar – Exercising Your Positive Duty With Positivity

Webinar – Exercising Your Positive Duty With Positivity

Latest News & Events

Webinar – Exercising Your Positive Duty With Positivity

money changing hands

ABOUT

From 1 December 2025, all Victorian businesses have a new positive duty to eliminate or reduce psychosocial hazards and that involves a lot more than just doing a risk assessment and updating your policies. It also provides a great opportunity for business leaders and HR and WHS professionals to generate real and lasting cultural change with strong employee engagement and psychological safety.

Peter Maguire, Practice Leader at Ridgeline HR and PosWork will be discussing this with Catie Paterson from Blue Kite Consulting. They share decades of experience in the HR field and are experts in workplace relations and related compliance as well as in positive psychology based workplace cultures and change management. When you blend all of that together, you’ll get much more than the same old risk management spiel on psychosocial hazards and they’ll teach you how to address the positive duty with positivity using a strengths-based approach with some practical exercises to boot.

DATE

Monday 10 November 2025 11:00 AM – Tuesday 11 November 2025 12:00 PM (UTC+11)

Bookings at https://www.trybooking.com/DGREZ

 

 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Court clarifies annual salary rules

Court clarifies annual salary rules

Latest News & Events

Court clarifies annual salary rules

money changing hands
 For many years, businesses have been paying people on an annualised salary basis using set off clauses in common law contracts to compensate for and set off monetary award entitlements against over award remuneration.  And, a long as people ended up better off overall than they would have been if the award was applied literally, that all seemed fair enough but is it? The Federal Court begs to differ. So what does that all mean?

 

About this case

This decision by the Federal Court arose from proceedings initiated by the Fair Work Ombudsman and a class action for employees in relation to alleged underpayment of wages by Coles and Woolworths. 

At issue was the question of over how long a period could an employer rely on a set-off provision in an employment contract to effect set-off of and compensation for award entitlements such as minimum wages, allowances, overtime and shift loadings and penalty rates.

In Coles case, the relevant period in the contract was 12 months and in Woolworths it was 6 months. 

There have been cases in the Fair Work Commission where annualised wage arrangements have been inserted in modern awards but the door had always been left open in the related decisions for another gateway via common law contracts.

The General Retail Industry Award 2020 which applies in this case doesn’t have an Annualised Wage Arrangements clause but it is quite specific on this issue in that it states: “Wages must be paid for a pay period according to the number of hours worked by the employee in the period or they may be averaged over a fortnight”. This “averaging” element is consistent with other arrangements across different industries where RDOs and averaging of wages is commonplace.

The judge in this case made the decision that employees have to be paid for hours in the pay period in which they worked them. That invalidated the arrangements that Coles and Woolworths relied on for people to work additional hours in some pay periods and set off the overtime and penalty payments applying to those hours against above award remuneration on other pay periods for up to 6 or 12 months.

So they now each have another considerable set of underpayments of wages to deal with, something that unfortunately happens far too often. 

Record keeping requirements 

A secondary issue that arose was in relation to Coles and Woolworths being found to have not complied with their record keeping obligations.

Specifically, Fair Work Regulations provide that an employer must maintain records of overtime hours worked and the starting and finishing times of overtime hours if a penalty rate of loading applies to those hours.

 It is quite common for people to believe that, if you are on salary, you don’t have to record your working hours. The judge made it clear that having a set-off clause does not exempt employers from other obligations under legislation and regulations and so Coles and Woolworths were obliged to maintain these overtime records and were in breach for not doing so.

The judge’s decision in this regard is consistent with Annual Wage Arrangement clauses where they exist in modern awards in that they require the keeping of records of starting and finishing times and breaks and annual reconciliations of actual hours and remuneration against what entitlements under the award would otherwise have been (ie but for the Annualised Wage Arrangement).

The decision also puts the two employers in a difficult situation in resolving underpayment claims if they don’t have clear records of the days and times that relevant employees actually worked pay period by pay period.

Other considerations

 Firstly, I would note that these major retailers have been trying to find a way around penalty rates for many years going back to WorkChoices which preceded the Fair Work era. The issue resurfaced again recently when employers made application to the Fair Work Commission to have the General Retail Industry Award 2020 varied to provide for a standard loading on minimum rates in compensation for overtime loadings and penalty rates.

The Albanese Government responded with a commitment to outlaw removal of overtime loadings and penalty rates from modern awards by legislation from 1 July 2026.

So the wagons really are circling around these entitlements in government, in the courts and in modern awards.

What do we learn from all of that? 

A few thoughts:

  1. You need to ensure that, if an employee is covered by a modern award or an enterprise agreement, the employee receives their full entitlement to wages, allowances, penalty rates and overtime loadings and any other monetary benefit as per that instrument in every pay period (subject to any averaging arrangement or other variation allowed for in the instrument).
  2. If there is significant variation in different pay periods in the hours of work of an employee who is on an annualised salary (or flat weekly or fortnightly or monthly wage), it is critical that you maintain records of the hours and do the reconciliations to ensure that the employee is not disadvantaged and that you have the evidence to support your position in the event of an underpayment claim.
  3. If you are using set-off clauses in common law contracts, you need to get these reviewed in the context of this decision and the difference that makes in their legal application.
  4. There are a variety of reasons why it is good practice to have accurate records of your employees’ actual (as opposed to notional or contractual) working hours, some of which are legal ones like the ones that have been cited in this case. So, if you aren’t doing that, it is something for you to look at.
  5. You might also find that it is just as easy to pay people an hourly rate and comply with the award in relation to additional payments for extra hours as and when those situations arise.

If you need someone to talk through the issues and options for your business, we would be happy to help.

Please call us on 0438 533 311 or email enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au if you want to explore how we might be of assistance with any issues like this in your business.

 

 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Fair Work and Safe Work crossover?

Fair Work and Safe Work crossover?

Latest News & Events

Fair Work and Safe Work crossover?

money changing hands
Recently, Safe Work NSW issued a prohibition notice to an employer directing it to pause in a redundancy consultation process because of concerns that it could have been causing psychological harm to workers. Consultation on redundancy situations has generally been in the domain of the Fair Work Commission but now we are seeing a crossover into the workplace health and safety jurisdiction via the positive duty that employers now have to eliminate or control psychosocial hazards, one of which is “poor change management”. What does this development mean?  

 

About this case

The University of Technology is implementing a cost reduction program planned to run through until 2029.

That potentially involves the loss of 150 or more jobs and the consultation process with employees and unions was underway with staff meetings and the release of the proposed plan scheduled for 3 and 4 September 2025.

On 2 September 2025, a Safe Work Inspector issued a prohibition notice in the belief that UTS workers would be exposed to a “serious and imminent risk of psychological harm” as a result of UTS’s Academic Change Proposal, in contravention of the Work Health and Safety Act and the Work Health and Safety Regulation.

It was reported that Academics at UTS complained of feeling stressed and fearful after the university paused enrolments for a significant number of the courses that they offer.

The prohibition notice was lifted after consultation with Safe Work NSW which resulted in UTS agreeing to allow more time and to consult with Health and Safety Representatives about measures to mitigate risks from psychosocial hazards. 

Our tertiary education sector is undergoing significant challenges associated with program funding, cost competitiveness and commercial viability.

It is also an industry sector which has been plagued with compliance breaches with a string of universities including UTS being required to enter into Enforceable Undertakings with the Fair Work Ombudsman and having to make good on millions of dollars in underpayments to staff. In UTS’s case, that happened in 2023 and amounted to $5.7 million in underpaid entitlements.

And, as is the case at UTS, that sort of culture makes for a significant level of union membership and representation when situations like this arise because there are underlying issues around psychological safety.

What can we learn from this? 

 There are quite a few take aways:

  1. Psychosocial hazards are a hot issue for WHS regulators and the positive duty on employers means that you have to show that you are actively managing them not just reacting when something happens.
  2. The lines between different jurisdictions are becoming increasingly blurred and people are likely to access the one which is going to deliver more timely and forceful impact – a WHS Prohibition Notice is likely going to be quicker and more impactful than a dispute notification to the Fair Work Commission.
  3. Gone are the days when you could just treat consultation as this tick box compliance exercise rather than as a genuine consideration with real employee voice and wellbeing components.
  4. This situation raises questions about the interaction of psychosocial hazards and other complaints on Fair Work matters – for example, would an underpayment of wages also constitute a breach in the psychosocial hazards space (inadequate reward and recognition and poor organisational justice come to mind).
  5. When implementing change which has an impact on people’s jobs, ensure that you follow the Consultation provisions in the relevant industrial instrument and that you genuinely allow sufficient time and proper consideration of employee questions and suggestions and that you respond to them reasonably and with adequate explanation. 
  6. You also need to be giving consideration to the real effects of any changes on people and how you support them individually and collectively through the process.

Change is complicated and something that you would be well advised to get some professional help with – from someone who understands the legal requirements but is also adept in communicating and helping people through the process in as positive a way as possible. 

Please call us on 0438 533 311 or email enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au if you want to explore how we might be of assistance with any issues like this in your business.

 

 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

“Same job same pay” has limited impact

“Same job same pay” has limited impact

Latest News & Events

“Same job same pay” has limited impact

example flexible working arrangement

The “Same job same pay” amendment to the Fair Work Act that is publicised as affording a labour hire worker the same pay as a worker directly hired by the host business is in but how extensive will the impact be.

Despite the very loud public outcries from some business organisations that this will be disastrous for business and reduce flexibility and productivity, the reality is that most organisations will not feel any impact at all.  

Like many of the Albanese Government’s workplace relations reforms, they are designed to redress perceived imbalances in certain situations and sometimes they are limited to particular industry sectors.

What does the legislative change mean? 

Applications can be made to the Fair Work Commission for a Regulated Labour Hire Arrangement Order through which the FWC can direct that an enterprise agreement applying to the host business in relation to its direct employees can be extended to also cover labour hire workers doing the same work as that  covered by that enterprise agreement.

In essence it means that the Fair Work Commission can order a labour hire firm to pay its employees the same monetary entitlements that apply under an enterprise agreement to workers employed by the host organisation (ie the business that the labour hire firm provides labour hire workers to). 

So it follows that your business will not be directly affected by this change if:

  • if you don’t have an enterprise agreement and/or
  • if you don’t use labour hire in your business and/or
  • if yours is not a labour hire business and/or
  • for other than labour hire businesses, if you are a small business employer with 15 or less employees.

There is quite a bit of detail on exemptions and rules and we don’t propose to go into that here. What we mainly want you to know is that this legislative change will have little if any impact on most organisations.

Plus,  because these Regulated Labour Hire Arrangement Orders cannot legally take effect until 1 November 2024, there is also plenty of time for the few really affected organisations to adjust to this new regime.

If you are using labour hire or are providing workers to perform work for another business and you want to check on your situation re this legislative change, give us a call on 0438 533 311. 

 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Major changes to building and construction award

Major changes to building and construction award

Latest News & Events

 

Major changes to Building and Construction Award  

 

Over the past few months, there have been a number of decisions made by the Fair Work Commission which have resulted in significant changes to the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010. 

These are variously associated with the 2019-2020 Annual Wage Review, the modern award review process and temporary arrangements that have been introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Details of all of these changes are set out below. 

2019-2020 Annual Wage Review

The Fair Work Commission recently handed down the 2019-2020 Annual Wage Review decision which was to increase the national minimum wage and award minimum wages by 1.75%. 

Unusually this year, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on businesses, they decided to set different operative dates for different industries – in the case of the building and construction and trades awards, that date is 1 November 2020 (rather than the standard date of 1 July that normally applies). 

Employers should check that employees’ wages are at or above award wage level including allowance for any award conditions set off in remuneration. 

The current Fair Work Ombudsman Pay Guide for this Award can be accessed at Building and Construction General On-site Award [MA000020] Pay Guide  

This will be updated from 1 November 2020 when the new rates take effect.  

Modern award review 

The modern award review process which has been going on since 2013 has a resulted in a number of changes to calculation of minimum wages, the treatment and application of allowances, arrangement of ordinary hours of work and RDOs and various other matters – these generally take effect from 1 July 2020. 

Simplification of minimum award wage calculations 

The Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010 has had an extremely complicated method of calculating the award rate for each classification level in the Award. 

This involved firstly identifying the base rate applicable to the relevant classification level and then adding a Special Allowance off $7.70 per week (something that was created years ago to give employees a pay rise when the rules didn’t allow for one) and then adding an industry allowance and, if the employee qualified,  a variety of other allowances could apply. 

The industry allowance was intended to compensate employees for the nature of the industry but additionally there were a number of allowances and special rates that applied on top of this.

From 1 July 2020, the method for calculating ordinary time rates for weekly employees (as per Clause 19.3 (b) of the Award) is by adding the minimum wage specified and the industry allowance for the industry sector and then any of the following that have application to the employee in question: 

  • Tools and protective or other clothing or equipment (Clause 20.1)
  • Underground allowance (Clause 22.2)
  • Air-conditioning and refrigeration industry allowances (Clause 22.7)
  • Electrician’s licence allowance (Clause 22.8)
  • In charge of plant allowance (Clause 22.9) 

Industry Allowance 

The industry allowance has been amended to reflect a single industry allowance that replaces and compensates for the Special Allowance and a number of complex industry, disability and expense related allowances have been removed in the Award.  The rate for the industry allowance is based on the relevant construction sector and has been defined as a percentage of the “weekly standard rate” (standard rate means either the weekly or hourly minimum wage as stated for a Level 3 (CW/ECW 3) employee in clause 19.1). There is one rate for the commercial building industry (6% of the weekly standard rate = $51.75 per week) and a second for the residential building industry (4.8% of the weekly standard rate = $41.40 per week). 

Tool Allowance 

The tool allowance has also been revised to make it clear that employees are entitled to the allowance to cover maintaining their existing tools, not just purchasing new tools. Employees are also now entitled to be reimbursed for steel capped boots they are required to wear. 

Fares and travel pattern allowance

A significant change relates to the fares and travel pattern allowance employees receive. This allowance is normally $17.43 per day. Employees will now only receive this allowance, where they: 

  • start and finish their work day on a construction site; or
  • are required to perform prefabricated work in an open yard and are then required to erect or fix the pre-fabricated materials on-site. 

So employees who start and finish at a depot and are transported in paid time to and from the construction site are generally not eligible for the allowance. 

Additionally, Employees will no longer receive the travel allowance if they are offered free transport to the site or provided with a vehicle. Employees will also no longer get the allowance on days they do not work, like on an RDO or leave day. 

Living away from home allowance 

The Award amendments clarify an employer’s obligations in relation to this allowance. There are now clear options as to how entitlements are to be provided and how meal expenses can be reimbursed as follows: 

(i) pay the employee the greater of $72.02 per day or an amount which fully reimburses the employee for all reasonable accommodation and meal expenses incurred; or 

(ii) provide the worker with accommodation and three adequate meals each day; or

(iii) provide the worker with accommodation and reimburse the employee for all reasonable meal expenses; or 

(iv) where employees are required to live in camp, provide all board and accommodation free of charge. 

Rostered Days Off (RDOs)

The Award now provides greater flexibility in relation to RDOs. This includes allowing for the banking of RDOs and allowing an agreement to be reached between the employee and employer as to how and when an RDO is taken. 

Capping of daily ordinary hours 

Ordinary hours of work for part-time and casual employees have been capped at 8 hours per day. This means that any hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day by a part-time or casual employee are overtime and payable at overtime rates. 

It should be noted that, for full-time employees, the award prescribes that, unless the employer and a majority of employees agree otherwise, an RDO arrangement applies whereby 19 days of 8 hours and 1 RDO make up each 20 days (4 weeks) worked. 

If the employer and employees agree on a variation to that arrangement, no more than 8 ordinary hours can be worked in one day. 

Under any hours of work arrangement, full-time employees may work no more than 38 ordinary hours can be worked in one week (or an average of 38 hours over 4 weeks). 

Time off in lieu of overtime 

The Award now allows an employer and employee to agree to take time off instead of being paid for overtime that has been worked. This ability is limited to weekly full-time and part-time employees and time off is calculated on the basis of the hours of overtime actually worked. Time off must be taken within 6 months. There are a number of other conditions attached to time off in lieu arrangements that must be complied with. 

Payment of annual leave loading 

The Award now simplifies how annual leave loading is to be calculated – on the employee’s ordinary rate of pay rather than the complicated arrangement that existed previously.

Employers should familiarise themselves with the proposed changes to ensure that from the start of the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2020, their employees are being paid correctly and in line with any amendments to the Building Award. 

Please note that the modern award review process has not been completed for the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010 but that should occur in the next few months – when it has, the “2010” will be replaced with “2020.   

Additional measures during the COVID-19 pandemic 

There is a new Schedule X  in the Award setting out temporary flexibilities with leave during the COVID-19 pandemic – these apply for the period from 11 August 2020 to 30 September 2020. 

These provide that: 

  • employees can take up to 2 weeks if the employee is required by government or medical authorities or on the advice of a medical practitioner to self-isolate and is consequently prevented from working, or is otherwise prevented from working by measures taken by government or medical authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • instead of an employee taking paid annual leave on full pay, the employee and their employer may agree to the employee taking twice as much leave on half pay.
  • A number of conditions are attached to these arrangements. 

Given the current business and civil restrictions applying in Victoria, it could be expected that there will be an extension to the period of operation of these arrangements.

Need some help?

Just give us a call on 0438 533 311 or send us an enquiry through the contact form below and we will be happy to have a conversation about your needs and how we can help. 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH