Adult juniors to get adult wages

Adult juniors to get adult wages

Latest News & Events

Adult juniors to get adult wages

money changing hands

Lots of modern awards and enterprise agreements have junior rates of pay typically applying to workers who are under 20 or 21 years of age who don’t get a full adult wage for the work that they do. In a landmark decision, the Fair Work Commission has decided that that has to change for at least some of them.

About the case

On 6 June 2024, the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA) applied to change junior rates, seeking to increase rates of pay for employees aged 20 years old and under in the following 3 awards:

  • Fast Food Industry Award 2020
  • General Retail Industry Award 2020
  • Pharmacy Industry Award 2020

Part of the rationale behind the application is that employees who are 18 years or older should receive full adult rates because they are treated as adults in so many other aspects of law and life. For example, when you reach 18 years of age, you can legally:

  • Vote in elections (you must enrol with the Australian Electoral Commission)
  • Stand for public office (with some age limits for certain roles)
  • Serve on a jury if called
  • Be treated as an adult in the legal system (no longer a minor)
  • Enter into legally binding contracts (leases, loans, phone plans, etc.)
  • Open and control your own bank accounts and finances independently
  • Buy and consume alcohol legally
  • Purchase tobacco products
  • Enter licensed venues like pubs and clubs without a guardian
  • Apply for a full (unrestricted) driver licence (after meeting state requirements)
  • Travel independently and apply for an adult passport
  • Get married without parental consent
  • Make your own medical decisions
  • Create a will
  • Be fully responsible for debts and legal obligations

It is a fairly compelling argument.

About the decision

The Full Bench has decided that:

  • after 6 months’ experience, the rates payable to adult junior employees will be set at a rate of 100% of the full adult rate of pay
  • the current percentage rates for adult junior employees with less than 6 months’ experience with their current employer will stay the same
  • there will be no change to junior rates for persons aged under 18.

About implementation

The Full Bench has proposed that the decision be implemented in phases through a series of adjustments of 5% made on and from 1/12/26, 1/7/27, 1/12/27, 1/7/28, 1/12/28 and 1/7/29 with the effect of:

  • The rate for 20 year olds going from the current 90% to 100% on 1 July 2027
  • The rate for 19 year olds going from the current 80% to 100% on 1 July 2028
  • The rate for 18 year olds going from the current 70% to 100% on 1 July 2029

The Full Bench has called for submissions on the proposed implementation method but we see little likelihood of it changing and confirmation should be expected in the not too distant future.

Thoughts?

We have a few:

  1. As noted above, an employee who is in their first 6 months of employment is not eligible for these increases. So it would appear that the junior rates for 18 to 20 year olds will stay in the awards and it will be up to employers to increase their wages to the adult rate once they complete six months service. Just one extra layer of complexity and another administrative task to deal with.
  2. These increases will of course apply on top of award wage increases from Annual Wage Reviews that take effect from 1 July each year which will mean a double whammy of those increases and the Adult Junior adjustments from the same date in the next 3 years.
  3. Now that this decision has been made, we can expect a raft of applications to vary every other award with rates for juniors or unapprenticed youths and that these adjustments will flow fairly automatically to those other awards.
  4. For female dominated industries where award rates have recently been increased significantly on work value and gender equality grounds and there are junior rates (eg in the Children’s Services Award 2020), there is a compounding effect.
  5. Other award variations are likely to be necessary eg with adult apprentices which are based on the premise that an adult is at least 21 years old.
  6. The next test case might perhaps be on rates for trainees and apprentices – we will have to wait and see,
  7. If you have an enterprise agreement with junior rates in it, you will need to prepare to change that in your next agreement because the Better Off Overall Test will require that. 

If you need a hand working through what this all means for your business, send us a message through the “Tell us what you need help with” form below.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Sham contracting in the spotlight

Sham contracting in the spotlight

Latest News & Events

Sham contracting in the spotlight

money changing hands

Every few years, the subject of sham contracting gets regulators’ attention and those regulators often collaborate with each other across jurisdictions. The Australian Taxation Office and the Fair Work Ombudsman have jointly announced that they are doing just that. And the Albanese Government changed the rules on what organisations need to be doing to ensure that they don’t engage in sham contracting. How does that change things?

What is sham contracting?

According to the Fair Work Ombudsman, “sham contracting happens when an employer misrepresents to a worker that an employment relationship is an independent contracting arrangement when the employer doesn’t reasonably believe this. This might be done in an attempt to avoid paying entitlements such as super, leave and workers’ compensation. This practice undermines or ignores workers’ rights and disadvantages honest businesses. Those who engage in sham contracting can face court-ordered penalties.”

It might also be when a worker proposes engagement as an independent contractor for the purposes of avoiding taxation liabilities. 

From recklessness to reasonableness

As of February 2024, the legal test for defending a sham contracting claim was updated to a “reasonableness” test. To avoid penalties, the principal in the relationship must now prove that, at the time of the arrangement, they reasonably believed the worker was a contractor. This replaced the previous, more lenient “recklessness” test, making it harder for employers to defend against claims.

So now there is a much higher onus on businesses to properly consider whether an arrangement is really that of an independent contractor rather than that of an employee.

Income matching and reporting

The Taxable Payments Reporting System requires businesses who engage contractors providing services in certain industries to report those payments to the Australian Taxation Office.. The nominated industries are:

  • building and construction
  • cleaning
  • courier and road freight
  • information technology
  • security, investigation or surveillance.

If the revenue you receive from these services is 10% or more of total revenue, you are required to lodge a Total Payment Annual Report (TPAR) with the ATO.

If contracting businesses are generating a significant proportion of their revenue from one source, there will likely be a suspicion that it is a sham contracting arrangement. 

So what if you are found to be sham contracting

Under the Fair Work Act, courts can impose penalties against businesses or individuals for sham contracting. The maximum penalties for each contravention are:

  • $19,800 for individuals
  • $99,000 for businesses with fewer than 15 employees
  • for businesses with 15 or more employees, the greater of $495,000 or three times the underpayment amount.

Apart from the penalties imposed by the Fair Work Act, businesses who incorrectly treat an employee as an independent contractor risk other penalties and charges, including:

  • PAYG withholding penalty for failing to deduct tax from worker payments and send it to the ATO
  • super guarantee charge (SGC), which is more than the super that would have been paid if the worker was classified correctly. SGC consists of:
    • super guarantee shortfall amount
    • nominal interest
    • an administration fee
  • additional super guarantee penalties including the Part 7 penalty amount of up to 200% of the SGC under the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992.

A few pointers

  1. The fact that someone has an ABN doesn’t make them an independent contractor.
  2. If they are paid by the hour for doing work that an employee could do and there is an ongoing arrangement for the worker to continue to do that work (not just come in and do a finite job like servicing a machine or building a s structure), there would be exposure to a suspicion of sham contracting.
  3. The fact that it might be the worker who proposes the contracting arrangement does not relieve the principal of the legal responsibility to ensure that they reasonably believe the relationship to be a genuine independent contracting arrangement.
  4. The fact that a worker might have multiple ongoing contracts with different businesses does not necessarily mean that a valid contracting arrangement exists if they are personally performing all of the work under those contracts on a regular and systematic basis. They might actually be found to have multiple part-time jobs as employees. There has been a decision in the Fair Work Commission to that effect.
  5. If, other than the way that someone is paid ie by invoice rather than through payroll, the worker has the characteristics of an employee, the odds are that they really should be an employee
  6. Regardless of whether someone is engaged as a contractor if they are just or principally supplying their labour, they will likely be deemed to be an employee for the purpose of the superannuation guarantee. 

If you engage contractors, you should be assessing the relationships for genuineness in the legal context and there should be contracts for service which clearly set out the nature of the relationship and provide evidence of the worker’s genuine agreement to that contractual arrangement. Need a hand?  Send us a message through the “Tell us what you need help with” form below.

Note: much of the content in this blog is sourced from the websites of the Fair Work Ombudsman and the Australian Taxation Office.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

The results are in – what next?

The results are in – what next?

Latest News & Events

The results are in – what next?

money changing hands

The Albanese Government has had a landslide victory at the federal election – so what does that mean for employers?

One thing that this resounding election victory for Labor signals is that we have certainty about what the future of federal government looks like for at least the next 2 terms.

The Liberal/National Coalition is in disarray and its agenda, attitude and culture have been emphatically rejected by the Australian people.

I believe that our democracy is healthier when we have a strong Liberal Party as a responsible and influential balance in Parliament. So this is a sad state of affairs and it does mean that it will be years before we can hope for that to happen with what they have left in the Parliament.

So what does that mean if you are an employer?

Accept reality

If you were banking on the cavalry arriving via the return of a coalition government, forget it – it ain’t happening and won’t be for the foreseeable future.

So, all of those changes that Labor has made to employment laws in the last 3 years and which have flown on to modern awards are here to stay.

The right to disconnect (which for most businesses isn’t really a problem if they understand properly how it works) is staying.

Wage theft as a criminal offence (which is only a problem for someone who knowingly and deliberately rips employees off) is staying.

Employee expectations about flexible and hybrid working are also here to stay judging by the public backlash against the Coalition’s rhetoric on getting people back to the office and their subsequent and embarrassing backflip on that policy.

The demographic has shifted – we now have more millennials and Gen Zs and younger than Baby Boomers in the workforce and they are demanding honesty and transparency and purpose. So it is time to rethink your value proposition as an employer if you are going to attract and retain the talent you need and have a productive and happy workforce.

What else is coming?

The Albanese Government has already done most of what it wants to do in relation to changes to employment laws.

It has already forecast two areas for change:

  • The prohibition on restraint clauses in employment contracts for people whose remuneration is less than the High Income Threshold; and
  • Legislating protections of penalty rates due to some employer associations making application to the FWC to vary awards via annualised wage arrangements that might provide relief from penalty rates

There are also further reviews going on in the Fair Work Commission relative to Gender Wage Equality and with respect to “work and care” and they could deliver more changes in the next year or two.

The other area that businesses of all sizes need to be paying attention to are the positive duties which have come into play federally in relation to the prevention of sexual harassment and gender-based behaviours and, by State or Territory, in relation to the elimination or control of psychosocial hazards

In Queensland, the positive duty to prevent sexual harassment etc has also been subject to State legislation with all businesses having to assess risk sand put in place control plans by 1 March 2025.

What employers need to do

We developed our HEART model to provide simple guidance on the steps that organisations now need to take to be able to demonstrate true compliance in the new positive duty regime. It provides a roadmap for transparency and engagement as well as for effective compliance.

HONESTY

Educate yourself about what psychosocial hazards and sexual and other forms of harassment and discrimination are. Then have a good hard and honest look at yourself, your policies and practices and your peoples’ behaviour.

ENGAGEMENT

Consult with your people, educate them and listen to what they have to say. Build a culture of collaboration and shared interest.

ACCOUNTABILITY

Develop and implement positive policies and practical procedures to drive positive changes in language and behaviours and hold everyone responsible for playing their part.

REVIEW

This isn’t a transaction – it is a continuing journey and you need to continue to monitor and measure progress in collaboration and partnership with your people.

TRUST

Exercise empathy and vulnerability in leadership. Encourage and recognise diversity and peoples’ contributions and perspectives. Build trust, ensuring psychological safety for all.

Conclusion

We think that the election outcome is a victory for Australin culture and it has no doubt been fuelled by rejection of what we are seeing happening overseas and especially in the USA. We don’t want to be like that.

It is also a great opportunity for all leaders in business to take stock of exactly how aligned their workplace behaviours are with the desired Australin cultures.

Rather than thinking of the positive duties that have been introduced as just more compliance burdens, look at them as opportunities to explore, reflect and improve workplaces to be the best that they can be…..where people want to work.

If you would like to explore ways to take positive action to deal with all of these challenges, check out our suite of PosWork services at poswork.com.au or call us on 0438 533 311.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

Latest News & Events

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

example flexible working arrangement

As we go through the biggest era of change in employment laws and modern awards that we have ever seen, it is becoming increasingly important to have written contracts that clearly set out the pay and conditions applying to each individual employee or contractor. Do yours? And are they current, compliant and complete? 

Why do you need written contracts?

When you engage someone to work for you, whether as an employee or a contractor, it brings into play a host of legal obligations covered by the Fair Work Act and a variety of other legislation and, in the case of employees, modern awards and, where applicable, enterprise agreements. 

There are many purposes that contracts serve:

  1.  They educate you about your legal obligations and can be a source of information for decision-making on issues that arise in the relationship with the employee or contractor.
  2. They clearly set out the nature of the relationship between you and the employee (be it full-time, part-time, casual or fixed term) or contractor.
  3. They provide details on any duties or obligations that the employee or contractor is required to satisfy in the relationship with you.
  4. They provide evidence of the employee or contractor acceptance of the pay and conditions as set out in the contract and, assuming the fairness of the contract, can be used in defence of any claim that might be made against you or your business.
  5. There have been around 70 changes in employment law and modern awards and the rules around employment and contracting have undergone an overhaul recently.

The gap between employee and contractor is progressively becoming more blurred so you also want clarity, especially if the individual is not covered by a company (Pty Ltd) structure.

What are the changes that affect contracts? 

Some of the significant changes that need to be considered in contracts are:

  1. New definitions of employee, casual employee and contractor
  2. Prohibition of pay secrecy provisions
  3. A new jurisdiction at the Fair Work Commission for disputes in relation to unfair contract claims
  4. New jursidictions for road transport contractors and gig workers
  5. The “right to disconnect” and associated award provisions
  6. Changes to rules in relation to annual shutdowns
  7. Revised casual conversion provisions
  8. New jurisdictions for dispute resolution at the Fair Work Commission regarding sexual harassment, requests for flexible working arrangements, requests for extension of parental leave and complaints regarding the right to disconnect

These are just a few of the issues that need to be considered in constructing contracts and their relevance may well vary according to the industry, business setting, occupation and seniority of the role in question. 

Other considerations

While under the changes that we are currently seeing, we are moving back to multi-factorial assessment of the true nature of a relationship (eg contractor or employee), the contract is still an important piece of evidence in determining such questions.

Remember that one size does not fit all and don’t just adopt a template that you got from somewhere else or that is the standard on the HR compliance system that you use. It is imperative that the contract is a fit with your business arrangements and with the individual concerned – ie ensure that they reflect the reality.

We have also seen a number of prosecutions of corporations in recent years for underpayment of wages related to employees being put on contracts with fixed salaries which did not provide adequate remuneration for the hours that those employees actually worked.

So, if you do want to put people on salaries or you wish to set off any award entitlements that might apply to an employee, you need to both be very specific in the contract about exactly which award provisions are being set off and compensated for by the remuneration provided for in the contract and you have to make sure that the employee is actually better off than they would be if the award was literally applied to their employment, pay and conditions.

Also a heads up if you have restraint provisions that the ACCC is currently considering whether restraint provisions should be regulated or, in some cases, abolished – so watch this space.

How we can help

We have been helping clients with employment contracts for over 20 years.

We can advise you on award coverage, terms in awards that affect remuneration or impose certain conditions and help you in structuring remuneration and benefits so that your offer is compliant.

We can help you to navigate all of the changes that are coming in so that your contracts are current.

And we can help you to decide the style of contract that you want in each case and what needs to go into them to make them complete for that particular circumstance.

If you would like to explore how we can assist you with employment contracts, call us on 0438 533 311 or email enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au to arrange your free first consultation.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Closing loopholes no.2 – The Fair Work Commission and “Employee-like” workers

Closing loopholes no.2 – The Fair Work Commission and “Employee-like” workers

Latest News & Events

Closing loopholes no.2 – The Fair Work Commission and “Employee-like” workers

example flexible working arrangement

From 26/8/24, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) will have a new jurisdiction which includes the ability to set minimum standards for “employee-like workers” who perform work for a digital platform and will give those workers access to rights and powers that had previously been unavailable to them. This is part of the Federal Labor Government’s plan to address issues relating to the “gig economy”.

Who does it affect?

The first change being made is to define what an “employee-like worker” is as distinct from an employee and an individual contractor. A worker is considered “employee-like” if they meet two or more of the following characteristics:

  • They have low bargaining power
  • They have low authority over performance of work
  • They receive remuneration at or below the rate of employees performing similar work
  • Have any other characteristic prescribed by regulations

What are the changes?

Previously workers in this space had few rights but they will now have access to the following:

  •  Minimum standards –  A set of minimum standards can now be set to apply to these workers following application by a registered organisation representing employee like workers and their businesses, the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, or the FWC. There are limits to what can be included in Minimum Standards and the FWC can only include terms relating to penalty rates, minimum engagement and other similar matters if it is appropriate for the work being performed. Likewise they cannot include terms relating to overtime and rostering.
  • Collective bargaining – Employee-like workers will also be able to collectively bargain through a registered organisation representing them. These will be similar to enterprise agreements and will require the negotiating parties to consult and explain the terms of the agreement before they are approved by the FWC.
  • Unfair deactivation – Employee-like workers will now be able to apply to the FWC for assistance if they believe they have been unfairly de-activated from a digital platform. This will be available to employee-like workers who have been on a contract, or series of contracts, for at least 6-months with the digital platform.
  • Workplace delegates rights – Workplace delegates will now have additional protections while performing their duties and will have a right to reasonable communication with members of their employee organisation and anyone eligible to be members regarding any industrial relations concerns and they will also have a right to reasonable access to workplace facilities. There will additionally be a “Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code” developed by the Minister of The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations to guide both sides on valid deactivations.

These changes are a significant departure from the current norm for businesses operating in this space. To assist businesses and employee-like workers with the transition, the FWC has set up a Regulated Worker User Group to engage businesses and employee-like workers and explain the changes and keep everyone updated on the progress of the implementation of said changes. Click here for more information.

If you need any assistance with this or similar matters, please call us on 0438 533 311 or email us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Closing Loopholes no. 2 – Unfair Contractual Terms

Closing Loopholes no. 2 – Unfair Contractual Terms

Latest News & Events

Closing Loopholes no. 2 – Unfair Contractual Terms

example flexible working arrangement

From the 26th of August 2024 independent contractors will now have the ability to apply to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to resolve disputes between themselves and principals in matters relating to unfair contract terms in service contracts.

The change has been brought in to provide independent contractors (who earn below the contractor high income threshold) with a more inexpensive and informal pathway to resolving these disputes.

What does the FWC consider in these cases?

The FWC will apply tests to the relationship between the contractor and the principal to determine whether or not there are any instances of an unfair contractual relationship. The dispute, however, has to be about a matter that would be considered a workplace relations matter if the contractor was an employee of the principal:

Here are some of the matters that could be considered by the FWC in these cases:

  • The relative bargaining power of the two parties;
  • Whether the contract is significantly imbalanced in favour of one of the parties;
  • Whether specific contract terms are necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of one of the parties;
  • Whether a contract term is harsh, unjust, or unfair on one of the parties;
  • Whether the remuneration for the parties to the service contract is less than other employees or contractors performing similar work;
  • Any other matters the FWC considers relevant.

If the terms of the contract fail to meet the above criteria then the FWC may either set aside the contract term entirely or change the terms of the contract in order for it to be compliant.

What should I do next?

If your business is one that uses contractors it will be important to review the contracts that you have in place to ensure that it doesn’t contain terms that would fail to meet the above terms. Likewise when developing new contracts they should be made with these terms in mind.

Additionally, while we have no practical understanding of how these disputes will be settled by the FWC at this stage it also possible that it could draw additional scrutiny as to whether the relationship is actually that of an employer and employee as opposed to contractor and principal.

For more information you can visit the Fair Work Commission website regarding this matter by clicking this link

If you need any assistance with this or any other related matter please don’t hesitate to contact us on 0438 533 311 or by emailing us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH