Is your business ready for a privacy complaint?

Is your business ready for a privacy complaint?

Latest News & Events

Is your business ready for a privacy complaint?

money changing hands

The Office of the Australian Privacy Commissioner has just released their annual report which shows that there has been a really big increase in privacy complaints (up 60%) and a lot of that has to do with AI. You might think that that’s just an issue for government services and big businesses and, if that is the case, you might well be wrong and get caught out.

Who is covered by the Australian Privacy Principles?

Businesses with an annual turnover of $3,000,000 or more are automatically subject to the Australian Privacy Principles – that base turnover level is commonly still a small business. And, to be captured your small business needs to have generated that $3,000,000 in just one year retrospective all of the way back to 2002. That’s right, if your turnover exceeded that number just once in the past 25 years, you are caught.

Annual turnover for the purposes of the Privacy Act includes all income from all sources. Annual turnover does not include assets held, capital gains or proceeds of capital sales. If your small business has not operated for a whole financial year, you need to make a projection of full year annual turnover based on the income of your business during that period.

And those with less than $3,000,000 in annual turnover can still be captured if they fall into certain categories such as:

  • Healthcare, Education, and Child Care: any entity providing a “health service” must comply with the Privacy Act, regardless of its turnover. Under the law, a health service provider is defined as any organisation providing services related to physical, emotional, psychological, or mental health. these include traditional health service providers (private hospitals, day surgeries, medical practitioners, pharmacists, and allied health professionals), complementary therapists, child care centres, private schools, private tertiary educational institutions
  • Businesses trading in personal information: A business is considered to trade in personal information if they provide a benefit, service or advantage to collect personal information, or disclose personal information for a benefit, service or advantage. For example, swapping customer email databases with a joint marketing partner, participating in third-party lead exchanges, or disclosing customer details to secure a vendor subsidy or commercial concession all meet the legal threshold of trading data for a benefit or advantage.
  • Commonwealth Contracted Service Providers: Small businesses that provide services to, or on behalf of, Australian Government agencies or the Norfolk Island administration under a Commonwealth contract or subcontract are bound by the Act. (This does not apply to entities that merely receive Commonwealth funding for services that are not a function of the agency).
  • Related Bodies Corporate: A small business is automatically subject to the Privacy Act if it is related to a larger body corporate that is already covered by the Act. Corporate relatedness is evaluated using the statutory tests set out in the Corporations Act 2001 (such as holding company and subsidiary relationships).
  • Finance, Credit & Consumer Data:Operating a residential tenancy database (storing tenant personal data accessible by third parties).Carrying on a credit reporting business under Section 6P of the Privacy Act (governed by Part IIIA and the APPs).Acting as a reporting entity or authorized agent under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (compliance with APPs applies specifically to activities in relation to the AML/CTF Act and its regulations and rules).Holding accreditation under the Consumer Data Right (CDR) system under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (compliance with APPs applies to personal information held that is not CDR data; where information is CDR data, the specific CDR Privacy Safeguards apply instead).
  • Labor & Employment Relations:Operating as a registered or recognized employee association under the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.Functioning as a protected action ballot agent under the Fair Work Act 2009.
  • Telecommunications & Data Retention:Providing telecommunications services subject to data retention requirements under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (compliance with APPs applies specifically to activities regarding data collected and retained under Part 5-1A).

What happens if you don’t comply?

Failing to adhere to these rules when subject to the Act exposes an entity to statutory enforcement. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) holds regulatory powers to investigate individual privacy complaints, conduct conciliations, issue binding determinations, and initiate Commissioner-initiated investigations under its Privacy Regulatory Action Policy.

Would you like to opt in?

While navigating these specialized statutory rules requires careful operational oversight, legal compliance should not be viewed merely as a regulatory burden. Small businesses that are genuinely exempt can choose to voluntarily opt into the Privacy Act via the OAIC’s public opt-in register. Formally adhering to the Australian Privacy Principles serves as a strategic trust-building tool, signaling strong data stewardship and delivering a distinct competitive advantage in a privacy-conscious market.

Conclusion: Navigating Privacy in an AI World

This is just another compliance issue that businesses have to deal with and that is being aggravated by the uptake of AI.

Our recommendations:

  1. Do your due diligence and see if your business is covered by the Australian Privacy Principles? See this assessment tool.
  2. Access professional support in setting up your privacy system if it looks like your business is covered
  3. Be on the look out for AI generated complaints and obtain advice if you think you have one.

How can we help?

Use our HR Triage Service to explore your needs and we’ll either help you with the issue if owe think we can and are the best option for you or we’ll refer you to one of our trusted service delivery partners who can.

Just “Tell us what you need help with” via the form below and we’ll have a no obligation free chat with you about your needs.

 

Note1: AI has been used to source information for this piece but its design and content are otherwise original and human generated.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Is WFH really off the table?

Is WFH really off the table?

Latest News & Events

Is WFH really off the table?

money changing hands

The new Victorian Premier has announced that the Work From Home Mandate legislation will not be going ahead as is or until next year if it does. That provides some relief for Victorian employers, especially those who want people in the office but does it mean that employee claims to work from home are off the table?     

Background

The Victorian Government’s promise had been that workers who could do their jobs from home would have a guaranteed right to work from home for at least 2 days per week effective from 1 September 2026 for businesses with 15 or more employees. That has now been deferred to 1 July 2027.

Employers were also going to be liable for the costs of enabling employees to work from home with software, hardware, secure connections. That has reportedly been scrapped altogether.

That is good news but:

1️⃣ In the lead-up, a lot of the commentary has been about how this now deferred legislation interacts with employees’ existing rights to request flexible working arrangements (including WFH) under the Fair Work Act.
2️⃣ And these rights have been strengthened in the past couple of years with increased emphasis on consultation and access to the FWC for mediation, conciliation and arbitration if there is a disagreement between employer and employee.
3️⃣ About 60% of Australian workers have these rights (eg parents and carers and workers over 55 years of age and pregnant employees and those with disabilities and workers dealing with or supporting someone in a domestic violence situation) and there is no small business exemption.
4️⃣ There is no limitation like a guaranteed 2 days a week either – it could be every day!
5️⃣ How prepared would you be if one of your employees made that request tomorrow?
6️⃣ AI is already telling people about this other option and it will go there more with the Victorian legislation shelved for the moment.
7️⃣ If you haven’t done your homework. you might struggle to prove that rejection of a request was legitimately “on reasonable business grounds”, right?

So it really isn’t off the table, is it?

What else is in play?

Firstly, there is the Victorian election coming up in November and, if Labor doesn’t secure a majority government, the WFH Mandate legislation might well be dead.

Secondly, there is a major case running in the Fair Work Commission on development of a Work From Home provision for the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2020.  It looks like there is a way to go yet before we get an outcome there but watch this space as this is a test case and we can expect it to flow on to other awards.

Thirdly, we might see things cross over into the WHS jurisdiction through the positive duty to eliminate or reduce risks from psychosocial hazards like poor change management, poor support, poor job control, lack of organisational justice and more.

How can we help?

There are multiple jurisdictions in play here and that makes things complicated – we can help you to sort through those and come up with the right policy settings and workplace practices.

Just “Tell us what you need help with” via the form below and we’ll have a no obligation free chat with you about your needs and how we or one of our trusted affiliates can help. 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Why most businesses struggle with positive duties

Why most businesses struggle with positive duties

Latest News & Events

Why most businesses struggle with positive duties

money changing hands

The introduction of positive duties relative to both sexual harassment and related behaviours and psychosocial hazards is resulting in quite a bit of confusion for small business owners in particular.That is understandable and here is why and what to do about it. 

The problem

Last week, I attended the Workplace Health and Safety Expo at Jeff’s Shed along with thousands of others working in or interested in what’s new in workplace health and safety.

Many of the presentations were in or around d the subjects of psychosocial hazards and psychological safety.

And a majority of the exhibitors were selling tech solutions, many of which were said to help you to meet your positive duties re psychosocial hazards.

We know that the regulators have opted to apply the risk management model that has been used for decades as the foundation for control of psychosocial hazards.  

The reality is that one of the reasons that the positive duties have been introduced has been that the traditional risk management model hasn’t worked in management of risks from psychosocial hazards.

Why is this so?

There are good reasons for that. We need to do it differently because you can’t create psychological safety and meet the positive duty with deficit thinking.

That’s what the traditional risk management approach is – what’s wrong, who and what caused it and how do we fix it. 

If people think that they will be blamed or disciplined if they put their hand up, they won’t feel psychologically safe …… and that means that you can’t actually meet the positive duty obligation.

So are you going to get out the compliance hammer and do it the old way or are you going to turn the light on for everyone to see what good looks like?

How can we help?

We saw this problem coming over a decade ago and we went looking for and found a stack of tools that can help you meet your compliance obligations for real and build great employee engagement and psychological safety.

Our Practice Leader, Peter Maguire, is available to facilitate discussions with your management group or your Safety or Consultative Committee to work through these questions and tailor the right approach for your business and your people.  If you would like to know more about this, please let us know via the “Tell us what you need help with” Form below.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH