Industry Specific Redundancy Schemes 1

Industry Specific Redundancy Schemes 1

Latest News & Events

Industry Specific Redundancy Schemes 1

money changing hands

There are some unusual provisions in modern awards and these can deliver unexpected differences in entitlements for employees than what you might expect. For employers in the building and construction and plumbing and fire sprinkler industries, one such surprise is the industry specific redundancy schemes that apply in lieu of the National Employment Standard on redundancy. Here we unpack that.

Most employees in the country have their redundancy entitlements determined by the National Employment Standards which provides for up to 16 weeks of payment depending on how long the employee has been with the company for.

There are, however some exceptions to this – they are employees who receive their entitlements via an external fund that their employers make regular contributions to, like Incolink, or employees whose work is covered by an Industry Specific Redundancy Scheme provided for in a modern award. This is the first of a series of blogs about these exceptions and, in this one, we deal with those applying under the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 and the Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2020.

What is an Industry Specific Redundancy Scheme?

The Fair Work Act 2009 provides that the National Employment Standard on redundancy is displaced by an industry specific redundancy scheme where that is provided for in a modern award or an enterprise agreement. These schemes existed prior to creation of the relevant modern awards and have just been carried over into modern awards. They can have different rules and different levels of entitlement to those prescribed in the National Employment Standard.

What is different about the scheme in the building and plumbing awards?

The particular type of industry specific redundancy scheme that is in the building and plumbing awards was ostensibly created on the basis that employees in the industry typically worked from project to project and therefore were unlikely to accumulate sufficient continuous service with one employer to qualify for redundancy in the normal way. This is certainly not the case with the building and construction businesses which we service as they engage most employees on a continuing basis because they need them on that basis. 

There are three primary differences that apply under this industry specific redundancy scheme as compared to the National Employment Standard:

  • There is a different definition of redundancy and
  • There is a different set of entitlements to redundancy pay and
  • There is no small business exemption

The normal definition of a genuine redundancy is “when the employer or business no longer requires the job to be performed by anyone” as prescribed in the National Employment Standard which provides for up to 16 weeks redundancy pay based on length of continuous service. There is no entitlement in the first year of service.

In contrast, the definition of redundancy in the building and plumbing awards is “an employee who ceases to be employed by the employer for reasons other than those of misconduct or refusal of duty”. That industry specific redundancy scheme provides for a lesser maximum amount of redundancy pay (capped at 8 weeks after 4 years’ service) but also provides for pro rata payment in the first and subsequent years for each completed week of service.

There is also no small business exemption so that employers with less than 15 employees are also up for redundancy payments (unlike under the National Employment Standard).

On face value, you might think that employees covered under these awards are worse off than they would be under the National Employment Standard and, for an employee with more than 5 years service who is genuinely made redundant in the normal way, that would be true.

However, the different definition of redundancy in this industry specific redundancy scheme means that it is not just that genuine redundancy that attracts a redundancy payment.

The building and plumbing awards also state:“Provided that an employee employed for less than 12 months will be entitled to a redundancy/severance payment of 1.75 hours per week of service if, and only if, redundancy is occasioned otherwise than by the employee.”  

So what does all of that mean?

It means that any employee whose employment terminates for any reason other than “misconduct or refusal of duty”  is entitled to a redundancy payment:

  • In the first 12 months of employment and thereafter, if the employer initiates the termination eg if an employee is terminated due to genuine redundancy or on performance grounds or on incapacity grounds or due to loss of an essential qualification or any other reason except “misconduct or refusal of duty” plus
  • After the first 12 months of employment, if the employee initiates the termination eg if the employee resigns, retires or dies.

So, for example, if you have an employee who resigns after completing 4 or more years of service, you are up for 8 weeks in redundancy pay on top of their other final entitlements. 

What can employers do?

There are a few options.

The first is to make contributions to a redundancy fund like Incolink. The fund then manages any claims made by the employee for redundancy payments. The downside to this is that the costs can be quite high.

Another alternative is to have your own enterprise agreement. Through an enterprise agreement, you can alter or replace Award terms with ones that align more closely with how your company operates. This would allow you to replace the Industry Specific Redundancy Scheme with the NES term which has the normal meaning of redundancy.

It is also possible for employers who pay their employees significantly above the minimum rates specified in the Award to offset an employee’s entitlement to redundancy payments. Any attempt to do so should be spelt out in an employment contract and the employee affected should be made aware of what they are agreeing to in that contract. You, of course, also need to verify that you are actually paying sufficiently above award to set off the redundancy payment.

How can we help?

At Ridgeline HR we have a long history of assisting clients with navigating the intricacies of the Fair Work Act and Modern Awards and we can help businesses to manage their obligations to employees in any of the ways we have mentioned in this blog.

If you need assistance with understanding your obligations to your employees or changing how you meet your obligations to employees regarding the Industry Specific Redundancy Scheme or any other HR related matter please don’t hesitate to contact us on 0438 533 311 or at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

In subsequent blogs, we will deal with other Industry Specific Redundancy Schemes applying in other industries, some of which provide for higher redundancy pay than the National Employment Standard and some that provide redundancy pay for small business employers who would otherwise be exempt under the National Employment Standard.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Offshore worker’s unfair dismissal claim allowed

Offshore worker’s unfair dismissal claim allowed

Latest News & Events

Offshore worker’s unfair dismissal claim allowed

example flexible working arrangement

Are you using offshore workers in the belief that they are not covered by Australia’s Fair Work system? Well, you might be right….but then again, you might not.

What has happened?

Deputy President Slevin at the Fair Work Commission has determined that an offshore worker in the Philippines deemed by her contract to be an independent contractor is actually an Australian National System Employee with access to our unfair dismissal jurisdiction.

The case of Ms Joanna Pascua v Doessel Group Pty Ltd involves a worker engaged to do paralegal work for a Queensland law firm which terminated her contract due to alleged breach of contract which was disputed by the worker and resulted in her lodging an unfair dismissal claim.

That led to a jurisdictional hearing as the respondent alleged (among other things) that she wasn’t an employee and so couldn’t be dismissed.

Here is the decision.

Why did the FWC make that determination?

In his decision, the Deputy President goes into quite a bit of detail on the terms set out in the written contract between the parties as well as the duties and working arrangements for the applicant and relevant case law.

One problem for the respondent was that, in parts, the contract referred to the other party as an employee or had provisions which would typically be associated with an employment arrangement.

The Deputy President also made note that the worker was more likely to be an employee because she worked inside the respondent’s business rather than providing services to the business from outside it. That perspective might be a bit of a red flag for the validity of many nominal independent contracting arrangements, whether local or overseas.

Reference was also made to KPIs that were set for the worker and to potential award coverage under the Legal Services Award 2020 with commentary that what the worker was getting paid ($18 per hour) was significantly below the award rate for the classification of work that she was performing as he saw it. Another red flag perhaps given the current federal government’s legislative changes to protect “employee-like workers” and provide the Fair Work Commission with the power to deal with complaints of unfair contractual terms from independent contractors.

The Deputy President concluded: “For the foregoing reasons I find that the relationship was an employment relationship. Accordingly, the Respondent’s objection is dismissed.” I would note that the foregoing reasoning was a lot more extensive than what I have set out above but hopefully my summary gives you the gist of the factors in play. 

What does it mean?

One of the things that has been repeatedly emphasised in the extraordinary range and number of changes that we are experiencing in our workplace relations system is that the focus going forward will be on the true nature of the relationship rather than just what is written in a contract

Another is to provide some level of security and protection and complaints jurisdictions for what have been called “employee-like workers”, those who might not be classified as National System employees because they are nominally not employees.

While we might not have expected that this would extend to offshore workers, this decision brings a whole new rage of considerations to bear in entering into offshore engagement arrangements.

One thing that is very clear from this case is that the poor drafting of the contract between the parties was a significant factor in the Deputy President’s considerations – he literally pulled it to pieces.

So any business entering into independent contractor arrangements whether locally or overseas needs to get professionally drafted contracts that don’t leave any doubt as to the relationship between the parties.

Another issue to consider which has been on our mind. Is one of the potential outcomes of a complaint to the Fair Work Commission re unfair contract terms by an independent contractor, a determination that the worker is a National System employee rather than a contractor? We reckon that might be on the cards. What do you think?

If you need any assistance with this or any other employment or related matter, please contact us on 0438 533 311 or by emailing us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

Latest News & Events

Are your contracts current, compliant and complete?

example flexible working arrangement

As we go through the biggest era of change in employment laws and modern awards that we have ever seen, it is becoming increasingly important to have written contracts that clearly set out the pay and conditions applying to each individual employee or contractor. Do yours? And are they current, compliant and complete? 

Why do you need written contracts?

When you engage someone to work for you, whether as an employee or a contractor, it brings into play a host of legal obligations covered by the Fair Work Act and a variety of other legislation and, in the case of employees, modern awards and, where applicable, enterprise agreements. 

There are many purposes that contracts serve:

  1.  They educate you about your legal obligations and can be a source of information for decision-making on issues that arise in the relationship with the employee or contractor.
  2. They clearly set out the nature of the relationship between you and the employee (be it full-time, part-time, casual or fixed term) or contractor.
  3. They provide details on any duties or obligations that the employee or contractor is required to satisfy in the relationship with you.
  4. They provide evidence of the employee or contractor acceptance of the pay and conditions as set out in the contract and, assuming the fairness of the contract, can be used in defence of any claim that might be made against you or your business.
  5. There have been around 70 changes in employment law and modern awards and the rules around employment and contracting have undergone an overhaul recently.

The gap between employee and contractor is progressively becoming more blurred so you also want clarity, especially if the individual is not covered by a company (Pty Ltd) structure.

What are the changes that affect contracts? 

Some of the significant changes that need to be considered in contracts are:

  1. New definitions of employee, casual employee and contractor
  2. Prohibition of pay secrecy provisions
  3. A new jurisdiction at the Fair Work Commission for disputes in relation to unfair contract claims
  4. New jursidictions for road transport contractors and gig workers
  5. The “right to disconnect” and associated award provisions
  6. Changes to rules in relation to annual shutdowns
  7. Revised casual conversion provisions
  8. New jurisdictions for dispute resolution at the Fair Work Commission regarding sexual harassment, requests for flexible working arrangements, requests for extension of parental leave and complaints regarding the right to disconnect

These are just a few of the issues that need to be considered in constructing contracts and their relevance may well vary according to the industry, business setting, occupation and seniority of the role in question. 

Other considerations

While under the changes that we are currently seeing, we are moving back to multi-factorial assessment of the true nature of a relationship (eg contractor or employee), the contract is still an important piece of evidence in determining such questions.

Remember that one size does not fit all and don’t just adopt a template that you got from somewhere else or that is the standard on the HR compliance system that you use. It is imperative that the contract is a fit with your business arrangements and with the individual concerned – ie ensure that they reflect the reality.

We have also seen a number of prosecutions of corporations in recent years for underpayment of wages related to employees being put on contracts with fixed salaries which did not provide adequate remuneration for the hours that those employees actually worked.

So, if you do want to put people on salaries or you wish to set off any award entitlements that might apply to an employee, you need to both be very specific in the contract about exactly which award provisions are being set off and compensated for by the remuneration provided for in the contract and you have to make sure that the employee is actually better off than they would be if the award was literally applied to their employment, pay and conditions.

Also a heads up if you have restraint provisions that the ACCC is currently considering whether restraint provisions should be regulated or, in some cases, abolished – so watch this space.

How we can help

We have been helping clients with employment contracts for over 20 years.

We can advise you on award coverage, terms in awards that affect remuneration or impose certain conditions and help you in structuring remuneration and benefits so that your offer is compliant.

We can help you to navigate all of the changes that are coming in so that your contracts are current.

And we can help you to decide the style of contract that you want in each case and what needs to go into them to make them complete for that particular circumstance.

If you would like to explore how we can assist you with employment contracts, call us on 0438 533 311 or email enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au to arrange your free first consultation.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Updated Fair Work Statements

Updated Fair Work Statements

Latest News & Events

Updated Fair Work Statements

example flexible working arrangement

There are a range of statements which employers must give to new employees before, on or as soon as possible after commencement and they are updated each year. Here is the new set as at 1 July 2024. 

The Fair Work Information Statement

This must be provided to all new employees regardless of how they are engaged ie whether full-time, part-time, casual, seasonal or other fixed term.

It provides employees with a variety of information on entitlements and protections at work as derived from legislation, awards, enterprise agreements  and employment contracts as well as where to go for help. Download it below.

Fair Work Information Statement 010724 

The Casual Employment Information Statement

This sets out the grounds on which employment might be deemed to be casual. It also provides informatIon on a casual employee’s rights in relation to casual conversion and avenues and processes for resolution of any disputes in relation to a declined request to convert to full-time or part-time employment. You can download it below.

Casual Employment Information Statement 010724

Please note that employers have more extensive obligations for providing casual employees with the Casual Employment Information Statement – both on commencement and:

  • In the case of a small business (less than 15 employees), after 12 months of employment
  • In the case of a larger business, after 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter.

Fixed Term Contract Information Statements 

From December 2023, new rules governing fixed term contracts limited the duration of contracts to a maximum aggregate period of 2 years and the number of extensions of fixed term contracts to one only.

All fixed term employees must be provided with the Fixed Term Contract Information Statement which sets out these rules, some of the differences between continuing employment entitlements and those applying to fixed term employees (eg in relation to redundancy and notice) and where to go for assistance in the event of a dispute over fixed term employment. You can download it below.

Fixed Term Contract Information Statement June 010724

What do you need to do?

You need to ensure that you comply with the above requirements to issue these notices to employees in line with their employment status. Failure to do so is a breach of National Employment Standards and can result in substantial fines.

Have you checked on the status of your compliance with Fair Work, modern awards, regulations and other employment-related legislation in recent times? If not, you should check in on that.

If you would like to learn more about ways that we can help you with this, please call us on 0438 533 311 or email us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Annual Wage Review decision is in

Annual Wage Review decision is in

Latest News & Events

Annual Wage Review decision is in

example flexible working arrangement

The Fair Work Commission’s Expert Panel has handed down this year’s Annual Wage Review decision which will see the federal minimum wage and award rates increase by 3.75% from 1 July 2024.  

The decision notes that impending tax cuts and the increase in the superannuation guarantee charge were moderating factors but also acknowledged that:  “Modern award minimum wages remain, in real terms, lower than they were five years ago, notwithstanding last year’s increase of 5.75 per cent, and employee households reliant on award wages are undergoing financial stress as a result.”

Balancing that, the decision also noted that: we consider that it is not appropriate at this time to increase award wages by any amount significantly above the inflation rate, principally because labour productivity is no higher than it was four years ago and productivity growth has only recently returned to positive territory”.

More to come?

For some industries – those which predominantly employ women – there will be more to come.

We have already had significant wage increases of up to 28% in aged care and there is currently a review being undertaken in relation to nurses and midwives.

In today’s decision, there is a commitment to doing more in this space as per the following statement:

“Modern awards and classifications applicable to early childhood education and care workers, disability home care workers and other social and community services workers, dental assistants, medical technicians, psychologists, other health professionals and pharmacists will be the subject of Commission-initiated proceedings to examine and address gender undervaluation. These proceedings will commence shortly after the issue of this decision and we intend that they will be completed by the time of next year’s Review, which will then move on to the consideration of other gender undervaluation issues.”

So, if you are an employer in any of those industries, you can expect that there will be further “work value” wage decisions in the year ahead.

What do you need to do?

You need to review all employees’ wages to verify that they remain above award when the minimum and award wage increases take effect on 1 July 2024.

If employees are paid sufficiently above award, the increases can be fully absorbed against over-award payments unless there is an enterprise agreement or employment contract that says otherwise.

If you are paying people on an annualised salary or a flat weekly wage, you need to review that to verify that, when you take into account all of the payments that would apply to an employee under the relevant award and based on the hours that they work, the employee is still better off overall on the salary of wage than they would be under award conditions.

Some awards have specific rules ion annualising wages or default provisions which [provide for a certain margin above award offsetting other award conditions. Check the relevant award for your workers to see if any of these apply. 

Don’t forget that the superannuation guarantee charge is increasing by another 0.5% from 1 July 2024 taking it to 11.5% of ordinary time earnings.

Finally, it always an opportune time to review your employment contracts when these annual wage reviews occur. That is even more true this year with all of the changes to the Fair Work Act and modern awards that have been occurring of late.

We can assist you in all of these areas.

If you would like to learn more about ways that we can do this, please call us on 0438 533 311 or email us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Webinar #2 – Understanding the Fair Work system and the players

Webinar #2 – Understanding the Fair Work system and the players

Latest News & Events

Webinar #2 – Understanding the Fair Work system and the players

example flexible working arrangement

Our Australian system for regulation of employment rights and obligations is very complex.

In this episode, we explain how it all works, who the various regulators are and where you should go for what.

What you will learn in the webinar:

  • What responsibilities do each of the regulators have?
  • What sorts of issues do they deal with?
  • What powers do they have?
  • Which are federal and which are State-based?
  • What do you as a business owner and employer need to do to protect your business and yourself?
  • How to navigate the Fair Work Ombudsman and Fair Work Commission websites?
  • Where can you find resources that can help you with managing these obligations as well as resources that can help you with managing people generally?

Bookings at https://www.trybooking.com/CQQHJ.

If you would like to learn more about ways that we can do this, please call us on 1300 108 488 or email us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH