Relationships matter

Relationships matter

Latest News & Events

Relationships matter

example flexible working arrangement

There are lots of organisations around who say: “people are our greatest asset” but, when we have a good look inside them, we sometimes struggle to see how that tenet is actually being lived in practice 

It isn’t unusual to find that organisations can invest a lot in policies, procedures, surveys and metrics and individual development and performance management and still not get the cultural and performance outcomes that they are looking for.

As much as all of that investment in systems, processes, data and resources is important, we are also dealing with human beings and, to a significant degree, the return on those investments is dependent on people’s ability and engagement to utilise those resources and to collaborate with each other.

Yet it is rare that we find that relationships feature significantly, if at all,  in performance or development management processes.

If people are your greatest asset, why is that?

The simple reality

In any job that I do, there will be people whom I rely on for certain inputs that I need to do my job and there will be other people who rely on me for certain outputs from me  to do their jobs, 

Anyone who has implemented lean quality systems understands process mapping and internal customer/supplier relationships and how important they are for getting work processes right with minimal waste and optimal efficiency.

But those relationships are between human beings ie the people or teams who are those customers and suppliers.

How effective are you in assuring that the people in those process chains understand their interdependencies, have the training and resources (including time) to play their part and are supportively held accountable for doing that?

When people arrive

Whether you call it induction or onboarding or orientation or some other name, that new experience when someone joins your organisation has a profound impact on how quickly the new starter settles in and becomes productive and what they think about the culture of their new workplace and whether they will be happy there.

Typically, what we see in this entry program is a lot of stuff around rules and administration and compliance and the physical workplace and work processes/systems and sometimes some stuff around desired organisation culture, values, vision, mission, etc

There might be someone appointed as buddy but we don’t often see anything really constructive in key relationships ie the people this person is going to rely on for stuff and the people who this person is going to rely on to do their stuff.

Given what we have already said about the importance of people, wouldn’t it make sense to help the new starter to understand these key relationships and interdependencies as soon as possible?

We recommend including meetings with each of the people that the new starter is going to have a key relationship with and asking that person to answer 3 questions for the new starter:

  • What their role is
  • What they rely on the new starter for
  • What the new starter relies on them for  

Just spending a little time up front on properly inducting a new starter into their key relationships can make such a positive difference to them and their development and the relationships……..and, of course, on their performance and the realisation of return on investment.

Why people leave

There is a mountain of research out there about why people leave organisations. Gallup says people leave managers, Culture Amp says that may be the case sometimes but it is more about leadership and development opportunities. Others says that money and recognition  are key issues.

I think that, in the main, people leave problematic relationships just as happens in other elements of life. That might be that I don’t think that my manager appreciates or supports me or it might be that I don’t see positive leadership that I respect and want to follow. It might be that I have outgrown the organisation and it isn’t able to provide me with the meaning that I need from work or meet my personal growth needs. Or it could be that there is one of more  internal relationship(s) that are negatively affecting me.

There is a lot that we can influence in all of that by investing in relationships with our people and having open and regular conversations with them so that we become aware of how they are feeling and can act to address any issues for them.

Of course, there are occasions when someone just gets an offer that you can’t match and they think it is too good to refuse or they leave for other reasons such as to start a family or their own business or some other personal endeavour or to retire. If the relationship is sound, those people will be advocates for you as an employer and sometimes people find that “the grass isn’t greener” and “money isn’t everything” and they might just come back if you leave the door open

There have been a couple of times in my career when, on announcing my resignation, my boss responded: “Why are you leaving? We had big plans for you”, Of course, I didn’t know of those plans because they hadn’t told me about them ie they had not invested in the relationship with me.

Don’t let that happen with your people.

The new positive duty regime

This year we are seeing the introduction of positive duties to eliminate or control psychosocial hazards and, guess what……..a lot of those psychosocial hazards are related to the quality of relationships.

Four of those are pretty obvious – “violent and aggressive behaviour”, “bullying”, “harassment including sexual harassment” and “conflict and poor workplace relationships and interactions”.

However, if you explore a number of the other psychosocial hazards, you will find that relationships have a lot to do with the risks associated with the particular hazard – for example, relationships between management and workers or between workers in the same or different businesses or between a company, its people and its customers to name a few. 

So, a key part of meeting the new positive duty is to assess relationship risk and put in place appropriate control measures.  

Of course, engaging your people in that conversation and building positive relationships is actually part of that process and the solution.

Conclusion

So investing in relationships is important because “relationships matter” – to staff engagement and wellbeing, to staff retention , to productivity and for legal compliance.

 So why wouldn’t you do that?

 

Need help?

  • Give us a call on 1300 108 488 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

example flexible working arrangement

The next psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “traumatic events or material”.

Why is traumatic events or material a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard is about workers who witness, investigate or are exposed to traumatic events or material. A person is more likely to experience an event as traumatic when it is unexpected, is perceived as uncontrollable or is the result of intentional cruelty. This includes vicarious exposure and cumulative trauma.

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any low job control related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Do workers witness or have to investigate a fatality, a serious injury, abuse, neglect or serious incident?
  • Are workers exposed to seriously injured or deceased persons?
  • Are there situations where workers experience fear or extreme risks due to a motor vehicle or workplace accident or a crime like an armed robbery or assault or murder?
  • Do people’s jobs require them to deal with natural disasters, terrorism or war and be exposed to their effects in the course of their work?
  • Do workers support people who are victims of painful or traumatic events?
  • Does a worker’s job involve viewing, listening to or reading descriptions of painful or traumatic events experienced by others?
  • Are there any exposures to events which bring up traumatic memories?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #7 – Poor organisational justice

Psychosocial hazard #7 – Poor organisational justice

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #7 – Poor organisational justice

example flexible working arrangement

The seventh psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “poor organisational justice”.

Why is poor organisational justice a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard involves a lack of procedural justice (fair processes to reach decisions), informational fairness (keeping people informed) and interpersonal fairness (treating people with dignity and respect). Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any psychosocial hazards related to poor organisational justice in your workplace include:

  • Are there any failures to respect peoples’ privacy or to protect confidentiality of their personal information?
  • Are there cases where a worker’s performance is openly discussed in front of other people?
  • Are there any instances of people’s information being used for purposes other than that which the information was provided for?
  • Are any policies unfair or biased or do they deny any workers their rights?
  • Are policies applied inconsistently or in a biased way creating inequalities?
  • Does the organisation fail to recognise and accommodate the reasonable needs of workers?
  • Are there occurrences of actual or alleged cases of underperformance, misconduct and harmful behaviour that are not addressed appropriately or at all?
  • Are there inequalities in the allocation of work or shifts or opportunities that are discriminatory or unfair?
  • Are there different rules for different categories or groups of workers?
  • Are there inadequacies in policies and procedures compromising the capacity to make fair decisions on employment matters?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?
Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter. 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #4 – Lack of Role Clarity

Psychosocial hazard #4 – Lack of Role Clarity

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #4 – Lack of Role Clarity

example flexible working arrangement

The fourth in the list in the Model Code for Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “Lack of role clarity”.

Why is lack of job clarity a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard arises from people being subject to unclear, inconsistent or frequently changing roles, responsibilities or expectations and not having clear and accurate information. 

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any lack of role clarity related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Are people properly inducted into the organisation, their team and their role  or do they have to try to work it out by themselves?
  • Are there inconsistencies in work allocations and/or overlap in responsibilities between workers which make people confused about who is supposed to do what?
  • Do people receive instructions from multiple people and are not clear about who they report to?
  • Are there mixed messages or inconsistencies in communications on performance standards or do those standards seem to change from day to day or depending on who you talk to?
  • Is there adequate information on work processes or do people have to work it out for themselves?
  • Do people lack understanding of why work processes are designed as they are?
  • Are there inconsistencies in how people’s individual performance and behaviour is managed that confuses people about what the performance standards are?
  • is there a lack of clarity about work priorities (e.g. which tasks or stakeholder relationships are most important)? 

This list is not exhaustive and, while we have based these posts of the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter. 

 

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #3 – Poor Support

Psychosocial hazard #3 – Poor Support

Latest News & Events

 

Psychosocial hazard #3 – Poor Support

example flexible working arrangement

The third psychosocial hazard identified in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code for Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “poor support”.

Why is “poor support” a psychosocial hazard?

There are a range of ways in which people might be poorly supported – like how their supervisors or other workers interact with them or not having the availability or the quality of resources available to enable them to do their job and lots more.

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any poor support related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Do people receive insufficient, unclear or contradictory information related to their work?
  • Do people have all of  the things they need to do their job properly or on time and/or do they have to wait or compete for what they need ?
  • Are tools and systems and other resources  poorly maintained or inadequate for the work that is supposed to be undertaken? 
  • Are people given the instruction, training and time to develop skills that are necessary for the work they are to do? 
  • Can workers access supervisors consistently to make decisions and provide them with the guidance that they need?
  • Are there sufficient workers available to perform tasks safely?
  • Is it difficult for workers to call out for help when they need it because they cannot leave their workstation, or because they are working on their own or remotely?
  • is the workplace culture competitive and discouraging of people helping each other out?
  • Is it hard to find somewhere psychologically safe to talk to someone because there are no private facilities or meeting rooms in the workplace? 
  • Do people think that management doesn’t listen and doesn’t respond if anyone raises a concern?
  • Do people not get good performance feedback as it is not constructive, or helpful or it is non-existent?

This list is not exhaustive and, while we have based these posts of the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter. 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Your Swiss Army knife

Your Swiss Army knife

Latest News & Events

 

Your Swiss Army knife

example flexible working arrangement

 

One of the psychosocial hazards that research is showing to be at the forefront of the list that organisations need to address is that of lack of role clarity.

One of the tools that we can use to help to address that is the humble Position Description (PD) which has been around for decades and can be found in lots of different forms. 

In most places where I have worked as an employee or as a consultant, PDs are commonly treated as something we have to have for our quality accreditation or our HR compliance or something that we give people when we advertise a job or when they start employment with us. They are then filed away and forgotten about. 

This is really unfortunate because the PD is a very versatile tool and arguably one of the most powerful in a manager’s toolbox. 

So how can PDs be used to good effect? Here are 5 ways that we have used them.

#1. Compliance satisfaction

Every employer has a statutory duty to ensure that every employee is properly instructed in their duties and has the skills and abilities to perform their tasks safely for themselves and others. This is enshrined in workplace health and safety law and is also an important part of employment law in general.   

The PD is an effective aid to that instruction and skills assessment and enablement. It helps with documentary evidence of satisfaction of the statutory duties that all employers have as well as in dealing with employee grievances and actions against the employer (eg in demonstrating reasonable management action in response to an adverse action or bullying complaint).  

#2. Recruitment effectiveness

If you are going to be effective in recruitment, you first want to know what the attributes required for competent performance of a role are so that you can prepare a fit advertisement. 

You then need to identify selection criteria and the how to assess candidates by considering the attributes required in the role and the best ways to test candidates for those attributes. 

You also want to communicate what attributes are required to candidates (so that the right ones apply).  

A properly constructed PD helps with all of that and assists you to make an informed and evidence-based selection decision.

 #3. Targeted development

The content in PDs that details the skills, knowledge and attributes required provides a great foundation for assessing the technical strengths and weaknesses of an employee and why that is the way they are.  

That, in turn, can lead to targeted development that leverages those strengths or builds on areas of weakness. That will deliver the optimal return on investment in learning and provide the best support and recognition for the individual employee.  

It is also a great aid to onboarding of employees and getting them up and running quickly because their role and responsibilities are clearly communicated and easily understood from day one.

 #4. Performance management

Clearly, if we are going to expect people to perform their roles effectively, we have to tell them what their roles and responsibilities are and what performance standards are expected. A good PD does this and helps employees to be more productive and aligned in performance as a result.

Conversely, when performance management concerns arise, it is very important to go through a methodical, relevant and procedurally fair process that is supported by documentary evidence.  

The PD plays a critical part in this as it describes what is expected of the role the person is performing and the attributes required to meet those expectations. It also provides documentary evidence that the employer has clearly communicated the duties and expectations to the employee.  

Additionally, as with development of employees, the PD can be a useful tool for analysing why an employee might not be meeting expectations eg because they are lacking in some particular attribute (skill, ability or knowledge) required for the role.  

#5. Better employee engagement and wellbeing

Study after study tells us that key elements in good employee engagement and wellbeing practice include: 

  • giving people clarity about their roles and the expectations of them
  • providing the support that they need as an individual to be successful in their roles
  • having clear meaning and purpose in the work that they do and
  • feeling psychologically safe by feeling included and informed and involved in their work, in their relationships and in their team.

 A well-structured PD helps with all of these factors when all of the PD purposes outlined above are part of everyday practice in organisations.

 So that is why I think of the PD as the HR Swiss Army Knife – it can be used constructively in so many different ways. 

 Of course, it is just a tool and there are many others in the HR toolkit that need to be used to deliver best practice in People and Culture management.

Do you need to reimagine how you use PDs in your business?

How can we help?

We can provide you with tools like Position Descriptions and coaching in how to apply these tools effectively to control psychosocial hazards, otherwise meet your compliance obligations and build better communications and employee engagement.

If you want to know more, give us a call on 0438 533 311.



CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH