Why would I want to work for you?

Why would I want to work for you?

Latest News & Events

 

Why would I want to work for you?

great resignation

We are hearing a lot of business owners asking the question: “Where can I find the people I need for my business?”

Attracting and retaining the people we need is one of the greatest challenges that we have in business today.

The pandemic has had dramatic effects on the labour market in a number of ways:

  • Closed borders have meant that overseas students, backpackers and other migrant workers have not been here
  • Industries such as hospitality and tourism are ones that were hard hit and workers who had been stood down went looking for more secure work, found it and aren’t going back
  • Others which were under the pump like our essential services and frontline workers were stretched to breaking point and many have left to find less stressful work
  • People have moved to regional areas or interstate to get out of lockdown areas and to improve life balance
  • With work from home orders giving people the opportunity to do that, many have found that they like that and they want to keep doing it
  • Conversely, there are some who don’t want to work from home but would prefer to return to the office and finally
  • The pandemic has caused people to rethink what is important to them in life and where work fits in their lives and that impacts on their job choices.

As a result of all of these factors, the labour market is more competitive than it has ever been.

So how do you optimally position your business to be a preferred employer in these challenging times?

What do you have to offer when that potential employee asks the question: “Why would I want to work for you?”

What difference has the pandemic made to the answers to that question?

There have been numerous studies and surveys undertaken on what people want in their workplace and their career.
Generally, we shouldn’t be surprised with what these tell us – they are pretty obvious, when you think about it – people want:

  1. The opportunity to deploy their skills and talents on work that they enjoy
  2. The contribution that they make in their work to serve a purpose – to give meaning to their lives
  3. A sense of belonging in working for an organisation that they feel part of and can feel proud of
  4. Recognition for the work that they do in both monetary and self-esteem terms
  5. Flexibility that enables them to balance work commitments with other elements of their lives
  6. A sense of fairness and respect in the inclusion and behaviour of people in the organisation (ie everyone gets a fair go) and
  7. Trust in their employer, their boss and their colleagues to support them in their role, relationships and wellbeing.

These have always been important elements of a positive workplace culture, but the impact of the pandemic has amplified them.

Additionally, when it is an employee’s labour market as is very much the case today, candidates can pick and choose based on their personal preference set.

The challenges for employers

To be successful in today’s job market, an employer must have a valid and attractive Employer Value Proposition (EVP) which clearly answers that question: “Why would I want to work for you?”

For many business owners and managers, this requires a real mind shift – to open your mind up to new ways of working and new ways of leading and managing your people.

What flexibilities can you offer people in relation to when, where and perhaps even how they work in the role that you need filled?

While you might ideally want people to return full-time to the office, have a think about why you want that. Is it because that works best for you (because it is the way it was pre-pandemic) or is it because it is best for your people and, for that matter, the business?

Perhaps a hybrid arrangement could work – some time in the office with some time working at home or at a remote hub like a coworking space near the employee’s home.

Then there is that question of what your EVP is. Do you know?

One of the more remarkable things that we have found over the years is that 80% of job ads don’t actually give you a reason to apply for them and don’t differentiate from their competition at all.

If “people are your greatest asset” as is so often said, why don’t most job ads reflect that?

Again, you need to open your mind to where you are most likely to find the skills that you are looking for and what might be important to them in a role.

For example, a number of years ago we assisted a client with recruitment of a part-time administrative person, They started thinking of the role as 3 days a week for a full day.

Then we talked about where they would be likely to find the right person and what they had to offer someone in that segment of the labour market.

The business was in a quality suburban shopping strip with a good supermarket, a chemist, a dry cleaner and the other traders that you normally find in these places. There was a tram that stopped out the front of the office and there was nearby free parking. It was ideal for a parent with school children to work during school hours and get the other daily stuff done like picking up something for dinner or getting that script filled or the dry cleaning done. That meant that the kids could be picked up and taken home without any detours.

So they decided to reconfigure the hours for the job accordingly – 9.30 to 2.30 on 5 days per week.

They pitched it that way and got what they wanted because they thought about what a candidate would be looking for in the context of their personal needs. They crafted the role to fit that.

What is your EVP?

If you look at the 7 factors above, which of those give you a strategic advantage over your labour market competitors?

Then consider ways that you can:

  • Define your value proposition (be clear about what you offer and why it is of value) taking into account the specific market that you are likely to find people in
  • Articulate your value proposition (how do you leverage that to attract and retain the people that you need) and
  • Present it engagingly and authentically, making sure that it is real – you won’t keep people long if they find that the rhetoric didn’t fit with the reality.

Your people are a great resource for this.

Part of opening your mind up is about looking at how you interact with your people and how they might contribute in different ways to support the business.

Your people will have things that they value about working for you and they will also have ideas on what isn’t working so well or things that could help to attract and retain the people you need.

So ask them what they think. Run ideas that you have past them to see what they think.

Optimise the relationships with your people by really making them feel that their opinions and work contributions are both valued.

Would any of your employees be good ambassadors for your business (eg they might be happy to be in a video telling the public why they love working in your business)?

We know how effective customer testimonials can be for sales of our products or services – why wouldn’t testimonials by your staff work as well?

If you would like some assistance in developing your EVP so that you can position your business as an Employer of Choice – for real – we can help.

 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Is an enterprise agreement the answer?

Is an enterprise agreement the answer?

Latest News & Events

 

Is an enterprise agreement the answer?

Wouldn’t it be great if you could simplify compliance with modern awards and related matters?

If you could tailor content to your workplace?

If you could have everyone on the same terms of employment?

Guess what – you can do all of those things and more in an enterprise agreement.

What is an enterprise agreement?

An enterprise agreement is an agreement made between an employer and a group of employees on wages and conditions of employment for that group of employees.

They can be made with all or some employees in a particular enterprise and have to be approved by the Fair Work Commission.

They can incorporate modern awards that have application to the group of employees or they can exclude those modern awards, totally replacing them.

How are they made?

The process starts with the issue of a Notice of Representational Rights which informs the employees concerned that their employer wants to make an enterprise agreement and that they have the right to be represented in negotiation of that agreement.

Employees nominate one or more people to represent them and they can nominate themselves if they wish to.

If an employee is a member of a union, the union has default bargaining rights unless that employee nominates someone else as their bargaining representative.

The employer and employee representatives then develop a draft agreement and, when it has got to stage where there is a reasonable level of confidence that people are OK with it, a vote of employees is organised.

If a majority of the employees who vote, vote in favour of it, it is approved subject to certification by the Fair Work Commission.

What happens at the Fair Work Commission?

A copy of the signed agreement together with an Application to Approve an Enterprise Agreement (Form F16) and a Statutory Declaration (Form F17) and various other documents are filed with the Fair Work Commission.

The Commissioner who deals with it is then primarily concerned with the following questions:

  1. Whether the Agreement satisfies the Better Off Overall Test i.e. employees are better off under the Agreement than they would be under the relevant modern award(s).
  2. Whether the group of people covered by the agreement does not unfairly exclude other employees and
  3. Whether the Agreement has been fairly made i.e. the correct process has been followed, people have been properly consulted, prescribed timelines observed and people have been properly informed about the effects of making the Agreement on their wages and terms of employment before they voted on it

If the Commissioner has any concerns, an undertaking might be required or submissions might be invited for consideration.

Once the Commissioner can answer “yes” to the 3 questions noted above, the Agreement can be formally approved and legally takes effect from 7 days after the date of that approval.

Reasons for doing an enterprise agreement

There are a variety of very good reasons that might apply depending on the particular award coverage and the circumstances of the business. These include:

  1. Simplification: modern awards try to cover whole industries or particular occupations across multiple industries and we often find that much of the content in modern awards has little or any relevance to particular businesses. So we can trim it back to what is relevant.
  2. Flexibility: all modern awards have Individual Flexibility Clauses which allow some flexibility with existing employees in a limited range of matters and Facilitative Provisions which also allow some room for negotiation on some things. However, they won’t necessarily provide the sorts of flexibilities that employees might want and the employer is happy to offer and that can be addressed through an enterprise agreement.
  3. Customisation: modern awards are largely a one size fits all approach and we know that one size doesn’t fit all. For example, classification structures in modern awards are often difficult to apply to a particular business because they lack definition or they just don’t make sense. In most cases, they were developed decades ago and really don’t take account of technological and other changes to the way we work and the skills that we use today. If you pay people sufficiently above award, you can make your own structure that makes sense for your business and your people.
  4. Fairness: some modern awards have specific provisions which are just unfair for employer and employees. For example, modern awards which have Industry Specific Redundancy provisions allow an employee who resigns after at least one year’s service to receive a redundancy payment of up to 8 weeks while an employee who is retrenched after more than 5 years’ service gets less under the modern award than they would under the National Employment Standards that apply to most other employees. With an enterprise agreement, you can put everyone on the same footing with things like that.
  5. Protection: for some businesses, having an enterprise agreement of your own offers protection from coercion to enter into an enterprise agreement with a union which would force you to pay your workers at major project rates on all of the work that you do. That can make your business uncompetitive for other work. If you are in such an industry and have a non-unionised workforce who are happy to be that way, your own enterprise agreement can help you to get the right balance in paying higher rates on major project work and at lower levels on other work. Equally, a head contactor on a major project would likely want your business to have an enterprise agreement so as to avoid industrial relations disruptions to the project. All enterprise agreements are published on the Fair Work Commission’s website and you can use that to publicly demonstrate your employer value proposition to prospective employees because it is locked in by law.

Conclusions

The process for making an enterprise agreement is complicated and the Fair Work Commission’s approach to them is complex. Additionally, individual Commissioners can have their own way of dealing with them.

That means that you do need professional assistance in developing and implementing one and we can assist with that. Equally, if any of the scenarios described above fit your business situation, it can be a very worthwhile exercise that can deliver real positive change in workplace flexibility, fairness
and employee engagement.

If any of this is of interest to you, take advantage of our free first consultation to explore your options and how we can help.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Creative compliance – classification structures

Creative compliance – classification structures

Latest News & Events

 

Creative compliance – classification structures

great resignation

This is one of our creative compliance blogs where we explore options for being a little innovative within the constructs of the Fair Work system.

The Challenge

One of the difficulties that employers and employees can have with modern awards is understanding the classification and wage structures ie where a particular employee’s job fits and what the minimum rate of pay for that job is.

Why is this difficult?

Sadly, it is because classification structures in many awards simply don’t describe the work that people do. Some make no reference to tasks performed, some have some generic content around level of supervision or degree of independence which isn’t very helpful and some have stated qualification levels which, in some cases, are not actually relevant. 

How can that be the case?

Back in the early 1990s, employer associations and unions negotiated new so-called “skills based classification structures”. Ostensibly, this was about aligning job classifications and wage rates with industry training and qualification levels.

However, what actually happened was:

– Industry training people built the training curriculum and qualifications frameworks;

– Industrial relations people separately negotiated structures for each industry against a set of job benchmarks framed as a % of a tradesperson’s rate in the context of the particular awards relevant to the particular industry or occupation and the wage structures that already existed in those awards;

– Some industries simply set award classification levels by reference to the qualifications framework for the particular industry or occupation with little or no definition of tasks performed;

– Others set award classifications by aligning existing award wage levels for particular jobs (eg for a trades assistant or a forklift driver) with the closest benchmark % of the tradesperson’s rate, largely ignoring the qualifications framework in the negotiation process but including references after setting the wage levels; and

– While there were guidelines and the Australian Industrial Relations Commission nominally oversaw the process and had to approve the award classification structures, each industry pretty well did its own thing.

Some awards kept schedules of the pre-existing classification levels as references which were helpful.

Note: Ridgeline HR Practice Leader, Peter Maguire was a member of the Australian Textile Employers Industrial Relations Council and participated on the working party that developed the structure for the textile industry.

Then, with the advent of the Fair Work system, modern awards were created and there has been an ongoing modern award review process going on in the Fair Work Commission for the past 9 years.

With some awards, those reference schedules have been removed in these processes.

Of course, there is the other problem – that the way work is performed and the skills and knowledge required to perform that work effectively today can be very different to what it was when those so called skills-based classification structures were created 30 years ago.

Shouldn’t the Fair Work Commission fix it?

What is clear is that the award modernisation process really hasn’t been effective in modernising awards. It has largely been a rationalisation process to reduce the thousands of awards that operated federally and in States and Territories to a more manageable number. The Fair Work Commission has been effective in getting that number down to a bit over 120.

It has also been effective in standardising some provisions across awards to provide consistency but classification structures have largely been left alone and that is likely to remain the case.

What can you do about it?

If you are paying your people significantly above award, you have the opportunity of creating your own classification structure – something that you and your people see as being fair and that makes sense for your business.

You can do something entirely different to the award structure as long as people would all be paid more under your structure than they would be under the award structure.

What is important in implementing something of this sort is:

1. There are clear descriptors for each level which clearly differentiate between one level and the next

2. Your people are educated and consulted about the structure and are accepting of it as a fair way to recognise peoples’ skills and contributions

3. You have a process for people to seek reclassification based on their skills and abilities as they relate to your classification structure

4. Your classifications and remuneration satisfy the “Better Off Overall” principle i.e. they are above the award minimum rates for the corresponding award classifications

5. If other monetary award conditions (eg allowances or penalty payments or loadings) are to be factored into overall wage rates within your structure as well, your structure should include detail on what is included in the rates and how the calculations have been made

6. You update the rates every time there are award wage increases – generally these happen on 1 July each year via the federal minimum wage review conducted by the Fair Work Commission

7. You ensure that your contracts of employment and remuneration policies and procedures are aligned with your classification structure and processes.

You might also consider developing your own enterprise agreement and having that approved by your employees and the Fair Work Commission which makes it legally binding on all parties. It also serves as evidence that your pay and conditions are both fair and above award.

Conclusion

We do have strict compliance requirements under employment laws and modern awards but that doesn’t mean that you cannot be  creative and compliant.

If you want to explore opportunities to get creatively compliant, book in for your free first consultation by calling us on 0438 533 311 or emailing us at enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Is reference checking worthwhile?

Is reference checking worthwhile?

Latest News & Events

 

Is reference checking worthwhile?

great resignation

That is a question that is often asked and, like lots of things in the people and culture space, the answer is “that depends on how you do them”.

Properly structured and executed, reference checks can be invaluable.

They provide a real opportunity to explore the candidate’s fit with your business and the role in question through the lens of others’ real life experiences with and knowledge of them.

However, too often, there is a standardised HR procedure with generic questions ostensibly designed to ensure equal opportunity in the selection process, but which delivers little real intelligence about the candidate’s fit with your business and the role in question.

Here are our rules for conducting effective reference checks.

Rule #1: Do your preparation

Understand the role that you are recruiting to, the skills and knowledge that are necessary to perform the role effectively and the character attributes that exemplify your culture.

As you should do throughout the recruitment and selection process, think about the best ways that you can ascertain whether someone has those qualities.

Consider what you have learned about this candidate in the recruitment process to date  – what, based on the evidence at your disposal, you have reasonably determined that you are satisfied with and what you still have questions about. 

One simple way to do this is to get out a set of highlighters (physically or electronically), look at the Position Description for the role and use the traffic light method to work through each function and attribute to give you a good graphic picture of where the candidate is at – green means “yes”, yellow is “maybe” and red is “no”.

Then consider why you think that and how you can best answer the questions that you need to get answers to.

Rule #2: Purposefully design the conversation 

Remember that you need to know if this person is a fit with the role in your business and your culture – not the referee’s business and culture. 

Also remember that the referee can only effectively answer your questions if you firstly engage with them in a positive way and secondly give them the information on your needs so that they can respond in the right context.

So, in planning the conversation, you need to: 

  • Verify that the person is happy to act as a referee for the candidate and that the time is OK with a clear indication of how long it is likely to take (book a time that is convenient for the referee)
  • Provide a concise explanation of the nature of your business, the desired culture and the contribution that this role is expected to make so as to give the referee an accurate context in which to respond to your questions
  • Pose a series of questions that are based on your needs asking the referee to provide you with evidence of the candidate’s fit with those qualities based on their experience but very much in the context of your business
  • Express gratitude for the referee’s participation (that is just courteous but, if you want an extra reason, giving thanks builds goodwill and enhances your reputation and that might just pay off sometime).

Rule #3: Make it a conversation 

People are often nervous about providing referee’s comments especially if there is anything that might not be complimentary. 

It is important that you put the person at ease by making the process as informal as possible – make it a conversation rather than an interrogation. 

Start by thanking them for agreeing to act as a referee and confirm the process and time commitment for them.  Give them a brief overview of your business and the role for which the candidate has applied. 

Ask a few questions about the referee’s background eg “before we start talking about Mr XYZ, tell me a bit about yourself and your background.” This helps to give you context about the referee and helps the referee to relax into the conversation. 

Then establish the connection and level of the referee’s experience with and knowledge of the candidate. Explore the nature of the role(s) that the candidate had, what their key responsibilities were and how effective they were in meeting those. 

Also explore the culture of the organisation – ask what the core values were and how well the candidate fitted with those, asking for examples of situations and ways in which they practised the values in real terms.

Now it is time to drill down into the questions that you identified in the planning process as needing answers, making sure that you contextualise the questions to your needs. For example, “here at ABC Inc, our staff work closely with people in difficult circumstances, and we need to ensure that we are continuously supporting them and their mental health. How do you think Mr XYZ would manage that for the team he would lead in this role and why, based on your experience with him, do you think that is the case?” 

When you have finished your questions, ask the referee if there is anything that they would like to add. 

Finally, close off the conversation, thanking the referee for their time and information about the candidate. 

Rule #4: Reflect and revise 

Now revisit those questions that you came up with in the planning phase and the Position Description for the role. Adjust your ratings where appropriate based on the feedback that you received from referees. 

Ready to make the call now?

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Making policies real makes them work

Making policies real makes them work

Latest News & Events

 

Making policies real makes them work

There has been a lot said in the media of late about the state of cultures in Parliament House, in the media and in the corporate world.

We know that issues of gender equality, equal opportunity and gender-based harassment and violence have been present and commonplace in society and workplaces for decades.

In organisations, we have our discrimination and harassment policies and our gender equity quotas and annual reporting requirements and our EAPs and more……..yet what has really changed?

When you look at how organisations and people talk and behave today, has much progress been made for women in real terms and in everyday behaviours that they experience?

Sadly not much…. as is evident from the wave of protests and outcries that we are seeing and hearing from women across Australia today.

Why is it so?

The answer is that all of those policies and quotas and reporting requirements have (in the main) just been dealt with as compliance requirements. That is to say that they have been seen to be about minimising risk of exposure for not having done the due diligence of getting a tick in that box because our lawyers or government or our customers said that we had to.

This is a common failing of policy settings and organisational mindset in all sorts of areas.

For example:

  • When we do SWOT analyses, what are the first things we focus on – weaknesses (where can we be hurt) and threats (how can we be hurt) ie we focus on risk not strengths.
  • In implementing quality assurance processes in business, the motivation most often is getting the tick for accreditation on your brand because you want to be able to qualify for that next tender or to satisfy a key customer requirement for certification.
  • With WHS policies and procedures, the focus first and foremost is to get documented systems in place, instruct people to use them and have evidence of that instruction so as to nominally be able to demonstrate satisfaction of the primary obligation to have safe systems of work. 

This means, in reality, they are only real to the extent that they generate a risk management strategy and process. Does that have real impact on organisational cultures and behaviours? Probably not.

Too often policies set out commitments or principles that are simply not supported by processes or leadership mindsets and actions. Or we decide that for operational reasons we will create an exception eg “we can’t afford to lose Harry even if he did that.” Or we don’t seem to be able to find the time to do what is required.

These scenarios just create contradictions with the end result being that people just don’t believe … how could they when “the rhetoric” and “the reality” are miles apart?

What should we do about it? 

The first thing we need to do is to acknowledge that the traditional risk management approach to implementing change doesn’t change behaviour all by itself.

The second is that the risk management process has to be real. That means that we need to genuinely explore and address the policies, processes and people who present risk in reality to women in our workplace ie in the policy settings, processes, attitudes and behaviours that define our culture.

When you introduce a new policy, do you do a real risk assessment on people ie do we identify who will be challenged to comply with this and what will we do about that?

It is also essential that leaders open their minds and hearts to the experiences and perspectives of women – not through a risk management lens that is about protecting management or fixing a problem but through an engagement lens which is about obtaining the best outcome by really giving women a voice, listening to it and acting positively on what they say. Ask the question: “How can I help?”

Be clear about what we are wanting to achieve (our purpose in this) eg: that might be “We want a workplace where equality and safety are real for everyone every day.”

Articulate some clear principles or strategies that underpin that purpose and provide the foundation for effective action, eg:

  1. Women genuinely have a voice that is heard and listened to and acted on.
  2. There is an organisation-wide process of risk assessment – a deep reflection on the people, the language, the policies and procedures and the behaviours within the organisation that present risks or disadvantages for women (directly or indirectly).
  3. There is an organisation-wide commitment to change and to not be bystanders who allow gender-based discrimination and harassment to happen.
  4. There is an ever evolving, effective and inclusive plan to deliver our “workplace where equality and safety are real for everyone every day”.
  5. Every person is held accountable for their language and behaviours and management of their relationships through regular conversations, education and coaching and, where they are not enough, discipline.
  6. Our leaders “walk the talk” in practise without exception and take proactive steps to support equality and safety for women throughout our organisation.

If you really want to change the dynamic of the conversation, the process and the outcomes, consider using Appreciative Inquiry as your change management framework. It uses a positive psychology approach centred on strengths that is much more engaging and positive to work through than traditional change processes.

It is a big challenge

This is a massive challenge for organisations and for society as a whole – for women and for men.

We have generations of institutionalised gender inequality that have defined people’s beliefs, attitudes and behaviours and we have to challenge them if we are to make progress towards true gender equality.

And it isn’t going to happen overnight – it requires commitment, perseverance, resilience and passion to keep the momentum.

It also requires respect, understanding and patience to generate and sustain lasting change.

How can we help? 

We have recently launched a new suite of services centred in positive psychology which are essentially about “making better workplaces” where organisations and their people flourish – see www.poswork.com.au 

Equality, diversity and psychological safety are all key components of Better Workplaces.

If you are interested in exploring this further, call Peter Maguire on 0438 533 311 to arrange a free initial consultation.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH