Psychosocial hazard #11 – Violence and aggression

Psychosocial hazard #11 – Violence and aggression

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #11 – Violence and aggression

example flexible working arrangement

The eleventh psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “violence and aggression”.

Why is violence and aggression a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard involves violence or threats of violence from other workers including workers of other businesses as well as customers, suppliers, contractors, patients, inmates or clients. It includes assault and other aggressive behaviour like yelling or physically intimidating.

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any low job control related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Do your people provide care or services to people who are distressed, confused, afraid, ill, affected by drugs or alcohol or receiving unwelcome or involuntary treatment?
  • Are your people engaged in enforcement activities as police or prison officers or parking attendants or security guards or government compliance inspectors?
  • Do your people work in high crime areas?
  • Do people work in workplaces that handle high value or restricted items or ones that are restricted in movement or poorly lit?
  • Are people working alone, in isolation or in a remote area with a limited ability to call for help?
  • Do workers’ jobs require them to work in the community or in peoples’ homes or in any other unpredictable environment where another person may pose a risk to the worker?
  • Does work involve employees interacting with customers or other people face-to-face or online or by phone?
  • Are there any service methods or policies that cause or escalate frustration, anger, misunderstanding or conflict?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Relationships matter

Relationships matter

Latest News & Events

Relationships matter

example flexible working arrangement

There are lots of organisations around who say: “people are our greatest asset” but, when we have a good look inside them, we sometimes struggle to see how that tenet is actually being lived in practice 

It isn’t unusual to find that organisations can invest a lot in policies, procedures, surveys and metrics and individual development and performance management and still not get the cultural and performance outcomes that they are looking for.

As much as all of that investment in systems, processes, data and resources is important, we are also dealing with human beings and, to a significant degree, the return on those investments is dependent on people’s ability and engagement to utilise those resources and to collaborate with each other.

Yet it is rare that we find that relationships feature significantly, if at all,  in performance or development management processes.

If people are your greatest asset, why is that?

The simple reality

In any job that I do, there will be people whom I rely on for certain inputs that I need to do my job and there will be other people who rely on me for certain outputs from me  to do their jobs, 

Anyone who has implemented lean quality systems understands process mapping and internal customer/supplier relationships and how important they are for getting work processes right with minimal waste and optimal efficiency.

But those relationships are between human beings ie the people or teams who are those customers and suppliers.

How effective are you in assuring that the people in those process chains understand their interdependencies, have the training and resources (including time) to play their part and are supportively held accountable for doing that?

When people arrive

Whether you call it induction or onboarding or orientation or some other name, that new experience when someone joins your organisation has a profound impact on how quickly the new starter settles in and becomes productive and what they think about the culture of their new workplace and whether they will be happy there.

Typically, what we see in this entry program is a lot of stuff around rules and administration and compliance and the physical workplace and work processes/systems and sometimes some stuff around desired organisation culture, values, vision, mission, etc

There might be someone appointed as buddy but we don’t often see anything really constructive in key relationships ie the people this person is going to rely on for stuff and the people who this person is going to rely on to do their stuff.

Given what we have already said about the importance of people, wouldn’t it make sense to help the new starter to understand these key relationships and interdependencies as soon as possible?

We recommend including meetings with each of the people that the new starter is going to have a key relationship with and asking that person to answer 3 questions for the new starter:

  • What their role is
  • What they rely on the new starter for
  • What the new starter relies on them for  

Just spending a little time up front on properly inducting a new starter into their key relationships can make such a positive difference to them and their development and the relationships……..and, of course, on their performance and the realisation of return on investment.

Why people leave

There is a mountain of research out there about why people leave organisations. Gallup says people leave managers, Culture Amp says that may be the case sometimes but it is more about leadership and development opportunities. Others says that money and recognition  are key issues.

I think that, in the main, people leave problematic relationships just as happens in other elements of life. That might be that I don’t think that my manager appreciates or supports me or it might be that I don’t see positive leadership that I respect and want to follow. It might be that I have outgrown the organisation and it isn’t able to provide me with the meaning that I need from work or meet my personal growth needs. Or it could be that there is one of more  internal relationship(s) that are negatively affecting me.

There is a lot that we can influence in all of that by investing in relationships with our people and having open and regular conversations with them so that we become aware of how they are feeling and can act to address any issues for them.

Of course, there are occasions when someone just gets an offer that you can’t match and they think it is too good to refuse or they leave for other reasons such as to start a family or their own business or some other personal endeavour or to retire. If the relationship is sound, those people will be advocates for you as an employer and sometimes people find that “the grass isn’t greener” and “money isn’t everything” and they might just come back if you leave the door open

There have been a couple of times in my career when, on announcing my resignation, my boss responded: “Why are you leaving? We had big plans for you”, Of course, I didn’t know of those plans because they hadn’t told me about them ie they had not invested in the relationship with me.

Don’t let that happen with your people.

The new positive duty regime

This year we are seeing the introduction of positive duties to eliminate or control psychosocial hazards and, guess what……..a lot of those psychosocial hazards are related to the quality of relationships.

Four of those are pretty obvious – “violent and aggressive behaviour”, “bullying”, “harassment including sexual harassment” and “conflict and poor workplace relationships and interactions”.

However, if you explore a number of the other psychosocial hazards, you will find that relationships have a lot to do with the risks associated with the particular hazard – for example, relationships between management and workers or between workers in the same or different businesses or between a company, its people and its customers to name a few. 

So, a key part of meeting the new positive duty is to assess relationship risk and put in place appropriate control measures.  

Of course, engaging your people in that conversation and building positive relationships is actually part of that process and the solution.

Conclusion

So investing in relationships is important because “relationships matter” – to staff engagement and wellbeing, to staff retention , to productivity and for legal compliance.

 So why wouldn’t you do that?

 

Need help?

  • Give us a call on 1300 108 488 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #10 – Poor physical environment

Psychosocial hazard #10 – Poor physical environment

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #10 – Poor physical environment

example flexible working arrangement

The next psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “poor physical environment”.

Why is poor physical environment a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard involves workers who are exposed to unpleasant, poor quality or hazardous working environments or conditions. Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any psychosocial hazards arise from a poor physical environment in your workplace include:

  • Do people have to work on hazardous tasks or in hazardous conditions (eg in working with or near unsafe machinery or hazardous chemicals)?
  • Do people perform demanding work while wearing uncomfortable personal protective or other equipment (eg equipment that is poorly fitted, heavy or reduces visibility or mobility)?
  • Do workplace conditions such as poor lighting, high noice or uncomfortably high or low temperatures affect workers’ concentration or ability to complete tasks?
  • Are there any unpleasant work conditions such as poorly maintained or inadequate amenities, unpleasant smells or loud music?
  • Is any equipment poorly maintained so that it has become unsafe or noisy or it vibrates?
  • Do work-related accommodation, facilities and amenities contribute to worker fatigue because they are noisy, uncomfortable or prevent workers from getting enough sleep?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter. 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Annual leave management kit released

Annual leave management kit released

Latest News & Events

Annual leave management kit released

example flexible working arrangement

Earlier this year, a full bench of the Fair Work Commission issued orders to vary modern awards which had annual shutdown provisions in them.

Historically, when there is an annual shutdown (for example over the Christmas – New Year period), an employee who did not have sufficient annual leave to cover the closedown period was automatically placed on leave without pay for any days other than those covered. by annual leave or public holidays.

Awards generally also had a period of notice applying for employers to give  employees prior advice of the dates of the shutdown generally ranging from 4 weeks to 2 months depending on the particular award.

So what has changed?

From 1 May 2023, these modern awards provide that:

  • Employers must give employees written notice of the period of the shutdown at least 4 weeks/28 days prior to the shutdown (at least 2 months prior in the case of employees covered by the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020, the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020 and the Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2020)
  • That notice must also be provided as soon as is reasonably practicable after engagement for any new employee commencing within that period of notice
  • Employers must provide advice in writing to each individual employee who will have to take annual leave because of the shutdown directing them to take annual leave for that period (and employees have to comply with that direction so long as it is reasonable and in writing)
  • An employee who does not have sufficient annual leave to cover the closedown period may agree in writing to take leave without pay or to take annual leave in advance to cover that period of the shutdown which is not covered by annual leave.
  • If the employee does not have sufficient annual leave to cover the closedown and does not agree in writing to take leave without pay or annual leave in advance, the employer has the options to either provide the employee with work for the period not covered by annual leave and public holidays or to pay then for that period without any deduction from leave entitlements.

If the employee does not have sufficient annual leave to cover the shutdown and does not agree in writing to take leave without pay or annual leave in advance, the employer has the options to either provide the employee with work for the period not covered by annual leave and public holidays or to pay then for that period without any deduction from leave entitlements.

Dealing with the effects

We have prepared an Annual Leave Management Kit to help employers to deal with what is now a very complex area of administration of employee entitlements with strict rules regarding accrual of annual leave, additional entitlements for shiftworkers, cashing in of annual leave, directions to take excessive annual leave, agreements to take annual leave in advance and the above arrangements for annual shutdowns.

There is a general version and a Construction/Trades version that is geared to the longer notification time required under construction/trades Awards.

Need help?

 

  • If you are looking for advice on any HR issue, give us a call on 1300 108 488 to arrange your free first consultation 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #9 – Remote or isolated work

Psychosocial hazard #9 – Remote or isolated work

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #9 – Remote or isolated work

example flexible working arrangement

The ninth psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “remote or isolated work”.

Why is remote or isolated work a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard involves: 

  1. Work that is isolated from the assistance of other persons because of the location, time or nature of work.
  2.  Working in environments where there are long travel times, poor access to resources, or communications are limited and difficult. 

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any low job control related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Does the job involve a long commute to the worksite?
  • Are there significant delays in being able to enter or exit the worksite (eg prisons, tower cranes, confined spaces)?
  • Do employees work away from the usual workplace (e.g. working in clients’ homes, offsite or from home)
  • Is there limited access to resources because supplies are delivered infrequently or there are significant delays in delivery of extra necessary equipment?
  • Is there limited access to recreational opportunities or opportunities to escape work issues (eg when living in workers’ accommodation in remote areas)?
  • Is life balance, access to support networks and the ability to meet family responsibilities compromised by working and living remotely?
  • Is there anyone who just works on their own (eg a lone worker on a night shift)?
  • Is there limited access to reliable communications and technology because of inadequate infrastructure or signals or because systems are offline?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?
Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter. 

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

Latest News & Events

Psychosocial hazard #8 – Traumatic events or material

example flexible working arrangement

The next psychosocial hazard that is listed in Safe Work Australia’s Model Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work is “traumatic events or material”.

Why is traumatic events or material a psychosocial hazard?

This hazard is about workers who witness, investigate or are exposed to traumatic events or material. A person is more likely to experience an event as traumatic when it is unexpected, is perceived as uncontrollable or is the result of intentional cruelty. This includes vicarious exposure and cumulative trauma.

Some questions that you might ask to assess whether there are any low job control related psychosocial hazards in your workplace include:

  • Do workers witness or have to investigate a fatality, a serious injury, abuse, neglect or serious incident?
  • Are workers exposed to seriously injured or deceased persons?
  • Are there situations where workers experience fear or extreme risks due to a motor vehicle or workplace accident or a crime like an armed robbery or assault or murder?
  • Do people’s jobs require them to deal with natural disasters, terrorism or war and be exposed to their effects in the course of their work?
  • Do workers support people who are victims of painful or traumatic events?
  • Does a worker’s job involve viewing, listening to or reading descriptions of painful or traumatic events experienced by others?
  • Are there any exposures to events which bring up traumatic memories?

This list is not exhaustive and while we have based these posts on the model code produced by Safe Work Australia, there can be differences in the specific details for each State or Territory. So you need to check that in the jurisdiction in which your workplace lies.

Need help?

Give us a call on 0438 533 311 to arrange your free first consultation to see how we can help with advice and support on this or any other HR matter.

CONTACT US

Ridgeline Human Resources Pty Ltd
ABN : 24 091 644 094

enquiries@ridgelinehr.com.au

0438 533 311

PARTNER LINKS

TELL US WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH